Soonersincefitty
Sooner starter
My eternity suit will be my Sooners road jersey and my cross hanging from my neck... Although I probably won't get to dress myself for that day...
Good one Port...road 'white' to rep your purity...OK...
My eternity suit will be my Sooners road jersey and my cross hanging from my neck... Although I probably won't get to dress myself for that day...
I get your point. But I also remember that many all-time greats had lulls in the middle of their tenure and came back to take MNCs. In today's world, these guys would have been fired before their last or last few MNCs:
- Barry Switzer
- Darrell Royal
- Bear Bryant
- Vince Dooley
- There are more if I felt like doing any research
We seem to be arguing over whether Oklahoma's 2015 season was a "great" (or "flawless") season or a "good" season.
I'll say it was a "very good" season.....even at the risk of being labelled a spoiled or stupid fan.
The "bitchy and whiney" goes both ways.Stupid? No way. Some "seem" to be very bitchy and whiney though.
You seem to be devoid of logic and reasoning. I believe you're missing the "bigger picture".Of course, the infalible Briles & Patterson. Here are some facts on them:
1. This day & age, it's a lot easier for the former "dregs" to be competitive and harder for the tradition rich schools to remain elite. Scholarship limits have worked and talent is all over the place.
2. On to the specifics of Briles & Patterson:
2013 Fiesta Bowl: #15 Central Florida over #6 Baylor 52-42
2014 Cotton Bowl: #8 Michigan State over # 5 Baylor 42-41 (a game in which Baylor led by 20 in the 4th Quarter).
But great coaches don't get out-coached or upset, do they?
As for Patterson, he took over a solid perennial bowl team from Franchione and took them to the next step, building up TCU into a Top 10 program by the time they moved into the Big XII, going 47-5, going to 2 BCS Bowls, and 3 Top 7 finishes in the 4 years before coming to the Big XII. Yet, 4 years into being in the Big XII, he has all of 1/2 of a conference championship. Bob Stoops has triple that over the last 4 years (1/2 of a title in 2012 and a full title this year), a time when generally everyone agrees OU has been very down.
Patterson and Briles are fine coaches. Stoops is better and has proven it. Repeatedly. For 17 years.
And here's the kicker, I don't actually like Bob Stoops. I've known too many people that have interacted with him, and he is generally a not nice guy to people he feels are below him. But, he is a great coach.
You seem to be devoid of logic and reasoning.
When BU and TCU abuse us on the battle field, it will not be due to historical data. Rather, it will be with talent and coaching strategy. Superiority in talent is becoming the new success model for BU and TCU along with their already coaching superiority.
Trending + recent track record is a better barometer, imo, in gauging future success.
Exchange HC's with Bob going to either BU or TCU and I believe Bob would wind up with no better than the 3rd best team in the conference. Briles, imo, would take us to #8 within 3 years. Patterson might take 5 years to do the same. Bob will never achieve #8, imo.
Boomer Sooner
You seem to be devoid of logic and reasoning. I believe you're missing the "bigger picture".
When BU and TCU abuse us on the battle field, it will not be due to historical data. Rather, it will be with talent and coaching strategy. Superiority in talent is becoming the new success model for BU and TCU along with their already coaching superiority.
Trending + recent track record is a better barometer, imo, in gauging future success.
Exchange HC's with Bob going to either BU or TCU and I believe Bob would wind up with no better than the 3rd best team in the conference. Briles, imo, would take us to #8 within 3 years. Patterson might take 5 years to do the same. Bob will never achieve #8, imo.
Boomer Sooner
Coaching superiority? I guess we didn't just beat Baylor by 10 in Waco.
That ol rascally inferior Stoops.
We're trending up + recent road win = you're right it is a good guage...just gotta be able to do the math.
Unless you're Switzerland...like me.The "bitchy and whiney" goes both ways.
Fitty, what is Briles record against Stoops? Not Baylor, but Briles?I know, that's where I differ with Ft. Worth and his merry band of disgruntled malcontents.
They immerse themselves in this fantasy scenario where Bob is the consummate underachiever, and Briles and Patterson are the messiahs that can bring OU back to absolute CFB prominence.
I don't get it.
Were it that simple really.
Again, until there's a vid of Bob getting his freak on with a Great Dane and a pre-op tranny midget...I'm gonna stick with Mr. Stoops.
Better the devil we know. Eh?
I agree with you IF Bob isn't able to increase the overall talent in his program. The current talent level I think is sufficient to compete for Big XII titles from year to year. But I think the last couple of bowls have shown there is a pretty big gap in talent right now between OU and schools that have LEGIT shots for a national title.Exchange HC's with Bob going to either BU or TCU and I believe Bob would wind up with no better than the 3rd best team in the conference. Briles, imo, would take us to #8 within 3 years. Patterson might take 5 years to do the same. Bob will never achieve #8, imo.
Think it was mentioned....might also want to take a look at the "recruits" they are bringing in.You seem to be devoid of logic and reasoning. I believe you're missing the "bigger picture".
When BU and TCU abuse us on the battle field, it will not be due to tradition or any historical data on either side. Rather, it will be with talent and coaching strategy. Superiority in talent is becoming the new success model for BU and TCU along with their already coaching superiority.
Trending + recent track record is a better barometer, imo, in gauging future success.
Exchange HC's with Bob going to either BU or TCU and I believe Bob would wind up with no better than the 3rd best team in the conference. Briles, imo, would take us to #8 within 3 years. Patterson might take 5 years to do the same. Bob will never achieve #8, imo, and might not win another conference title.
Boomer Sooner
The BU and TCU wins were gift wrapped for Bob. We beat Stidham down the wire, not Russell. And, we defeated TCU by 1 point with Boykin out entirely.Coaching superiority? I guess we didn't just beat Baylor by 10 in Waco.
That ol rascally inferior Stoops.
We're trending up + recent road win = you're right it is a good guage...just gotta be able to do the math.
The BU and TCU wins were gift wrapped for Bob. We beat Stidham down the wire, not Russell. And, we defeated TCU by 1 point with Boykin out entirely.
No way we win either game with Russell and Boykin playing. We couldn't stop Watson in our bowl. What makes you think we beat Russell and Boykin? Russell (a better passer by a long shot and an effective runner averaging nearly 65 yards/game) is as good as Watson, imo, and Boykin is better than both.
But, you can keep wishing on your 4-leaf clover. OU has a great deal of talent with even more incoming. I believe BU and TCU's talent is better than ours and that extends to their coaching.
We shall see how things turn out on the playing field this year. Would prefer nothing more than for me to be wrong in my contentions.
Boomer Sooner
Only speculation on the outcomes. And we were without Mayfield for more than half the game against TCU. Why is that never mentioned?
Wishing on a 4 leaf clover? That doesn't make sense. I used your logic to make my point and you reply with sarcasm. Another high horse rider knocked out of the saddle. Don't worry, it's fun down here in the dirt.
We definitely wouldn't have beaten TCU if Boykin was playing. The Baylor game would have been very interesting if Russell had played. The fact is those 2 games turned out to be somewhat of a mirage and fooled a lot of people into thinking we were better than we actually were. I would have a lot more hope for the future if our recruiting looked better than it does. How can we be a top 5 program if we continually are out of the top 10 in recruiting?The BU and TCU wins were gift wrapped for Bob. We beat Stidham down the wire, not Russell. And, we defeated TCU by 1 point with Boykin out entirely.
No way we win either game with Russell and Boykin playing. We couldn't stop Watson in our bowl. What makes you think we beat Russell and Boykin? Russell (a better passer by a long shot and an effective runner averaging nearly 65 yards/game) is as good as Watson, imo, and Boykin is better than both.
But, you can keep wishing on your 4-leaf clover. OU has a great deal of talent with even more incoming. I believe BU and TCU's talent is better than ours and that extends to their coaching.
We shall see how things turn out on the playing field this year. Would prefer nothing more than for me to be wrong in my contentions.
Boomer Sooner
We definitely wouldn't have beaten TCU if Boykin was playing. The Baylor game would have been very interesting if Russell had played. The fact is those 2 games turned out to be somewhat of a mirage and fooled a lot of people into thinking we were better than we actually were. I would have a lot more hope for the future if our recruiting looked better than it does. How can we be a top 5 program if we continually are out of the top 10 in recruiting?
You definitely don't know what would've happened. No mirage. We played an average game against a good team. Period.
PS. Recruiting isnt over.
Oh my gawd...now we're back to our triumphs over Baylor, TCU and the Pokes were anomalies, slight of hand, smoke and mirrors.
That is such horseshit it isn't worthy of defending.
So I won't. Nor do I need to.
Funny, the ONLY folks that are tainting our success' are the very people that ostensibly support OU. Right...
My point is those wins made us look like a better team than what we were because of those two key injuries to their quarterbacks.Barking if boykin plays vs OU and Mayfield was out like he was? Yes in my opinion OU would have lost. However it didn't happen. Every team has injuries, the elite teams overcome them. We aren't there yet depth wise
While not discounting his 2000 National Title, I often wonder how he would be perceived without it.
Dooley? That is just silly. Other than overall wins, he is not close to any of the others mentioned.
Interesting info on Osborne. I wasn't aware that it took him 22 years to win a NC. At the rate we are going we are going to have to wait that long for another oneWere the others better? Yep. But 201 wins, 6 SEC Titles, and 1 MNC is nothing to sneeze at either.
I really should have included Tom Osborne though. He didn't win an MNC until his 22nd season at Nebraska, despite taking over the program in 1973 following Nebraska MNCs in 1970 & 1971.
Nebraska gave him time & he came through at the very end of his career.
You seem to be devoid of logic and reasoning. I believe you're missing the "bigger picture".
When BU and TCU abuse us on the battle field, it will not be due to tradition or any historical data on either side. Rather, it will be with talent and coaching strategy. Superiority in talent is becoming the new success model for BU and TCU along with their already coaching superiority.
You seem to give no thought to the fact that both have played us to their favor when they possessed lesser talent than OU.
Trending + recent track record is a better barometer, imo, in gauging future success.
Exchange HC's with Bob going to either BU or TCU and I believe Bob would wind up with no better than the 3rd best team in the conference. Briles, imo, would take us to #8 within 3 years. Patterson might take 5 years to do the same. Bob will never achieve #8, imo, and will be greatly challenged to even win another conference title.
Boomer Sooner
We definitely wouldn't have beaten TCU if Boykin was playing. The Baylor game would have been very interesting if Russell had played. The fact is those 2 games turned out to be somewhat of a mirage and fooled a lot of people into thinking we were better than we actually were. I would have a lot more hope for the future if our recruiting looked better than it does. How can we be a top 5 program if we continually are out of the top 10 in recruiting?
Baylor had a month to adjust their offense before they played their bowl game so I highly doubt they were worse off. As for TCU, they won the Oregon game because the Oregon center and QB got hurt in the first half.Baylor and TCU were a lot worse off when they played their Bowl games than when they played us and they bea tthe #10 & #15 teams in the country. So how was OU beating them a "mirage".
Also, with Mayfield, OU was up 23-7 at halftime against TCU. If Boykin and Mayfield both play the full game, you bet I think OU still wins.
And for the record, a lot of Russell's great numbers were put up against the lousy OOC shcedule Baylor always plays. Stidham put up FAR superior passing numbers against Big XII teams. I'm not convinced that we didn't beat them with their best QB. And either way, we win that game against either.
Were the others better? Yep. But 201 wins, 6 SEC Titles, and 1 MNC is nothing to sneeze at either.
I really should have included Tom Osborne though. He didn't win an MNC until his 22nd season at Nebraska, despite taking over the program in 1973 following Nebraska MNCs in 1970 & 1971.
Nebraska gave him time & he came through at the very end of his career.
Baylor had a month to adjust their offense before they played their bowl game so I highly doubt they were worse off. As for TCU, they won the Oregon game because the Oregon center and QB got hurt in the first half.
And luckily, Patterson decided to go for two, rather than kick a FG and take it to overtime. Pretty easy to see which team had all the offensive momentum had it gone to overtime. Be glad Patterson made that huge blunder.Didn't some team beat TCU when their starting QB got hurt early?
You make this to easy.
And luckily, Patterson decided to go for two, rather than kick a FG and take it to overtime. Pretty easy to see which team had all the offensive momentum had it gone to overtime. Be glad Patterson made that huge blunder.
LolThe superior Patterson made a blunder? What's happening in this world?!
Literally made me laugh out loud. Thanks. Reading the Eyeore Diaries was depressing me.The superior Patterson made a blunder? What's happening in this world?!