I do not foresee any improvement by the defense through the remainder of the season, regardless of who is plugged in as interim DC.
Riley and Castiglione have a lot of work ahead this coming off season. It may take this season and next season to undo the damage rendered by Mike Stoops, starting with recruiting.
Riley is everyone's up and coming young coach. Let's see how he responds by getting a capable and proven defensive coordinator. One who can bring an "attitude" along with him.I agree but I do expect to see a new attitude.
I do not foresee any improvement by the defense through the remainder of the season, regardless of who is plugged in as interim DC.
Riley and Castiglione have a lot of work ahead this coming off season. It may take this season and next season to undo the damage rendered by Mike Stoops, starting with recruiting.
There really doesn't need to be a massive turn around in the defense to make a huge difference though. Heck the Texas game they just needed a couple more stops in the first 3 Qtrs and OU wins the game.I do not foresee any improvement by the defense through the remainder of the season, regardless of who is plugged in as interim DC.
Riley and Castiglione have a lot of work ahead this coming off season. It may take this season and next season to undo the damage rendered by Mike Stoops, starting with recruiting.
Anything will be an improvement over what we've seen from Mike. We can't get any worse in red zone defense, and I doubt we get any worse on 3rd down. The plays that cost us the game on Saturday were the times we had Texas 3rd and 20 and then gave up 18 or 19 yards on 3rd down.
I foresee him bringing our opposing PPG average down from 27 to about 24.![]()
Heck, that's enough to be 6-0 instead of 5-1.
I honestly at this point don't know how the players viewed Stoops. I know a couple of guys spoke up in his behalf, but I've not seen a lot. Will they be happy about his firing and be more inspired? Will they kinda give up on this season? Not real sure what to expect. I kinda get the feeling that he did not have overwhelming support from his guys
I do not foresee any improvement by the defense....
We need to offer Grinch 1.5 million in the off season... other than Ruff, let him pick his staff.
We need to offer Grinch 1.5 million in the off season... other than Ruff, let him pick his staff.
Word is slowly coming out that there was a physical altercation in the locker room at half-time between Mikey and a player.I honestly at this point don't know how the players viewed Stoops. I know a couple of guys spoke up in his behalf, but I've not seen a lot. Will they be happy about his firing and be more inspired? Will they kinda give up on this season? Not real sure what to expect. I kinda get the feeling that he did not have overwhelming support from his guys
Word is slowly coming out that there was a physical altercation in the locker room at half-time between Mikey and a player.
He is not a play caller at tOSU.Grinch is an Ohio boy and with one of the elite programs in the country. I don’t see him leaving Ohio State for the same job at OU unless the money was big, and I don’t see OU paying anything near $1.3M much less $1.5. But maybe $1.2.That would be a $400k raise or $600k within a year from leaving Washington State. How many assistants can double their salary within 12 months?
Geez. I wonder why Lincoln didn’t just accept Mike’s offer to resign after the game? This sounds like Mike lost it. What a train wreak that must have been.
Grinch is an Ohio boy and with one of the elite programs in the country. I don’t see him leaving Ohio State for the same job at OU unless the money was big, and I don’t see OU paying anything near $1.3M much less $1.5. But maybe $1.2.That would be a $400k raise or $600k within a year from leaving Washington State. How many assistants can double their salary within 12 months?
Venables left Oklahoma for a job at Clemson, so program history can be overcome. Who knows what the relationship is like between Schiano and Grinch? Maybe sole DC and a nice raise would be enough for Grinch.
He is not a play caller at tOSU.
Good Point, Cal! It takes what it takes!I'm not saying that Mike getting into a fist fight with a team member was appropriate ...... but you gotta admit they played a little better in the second half. LOL
I'm not saying that Mike getting into a fist fight with a team member was appropriate ...... but you gotta admit they played a little better in the second half. LOL
I honestly at this point don't know how the players viewed Stoops. I know a couple of guys spoke up in his behalf, but I've not seen a lot. Will they be happy about his firing and be more inspired? Will they kinda give up on this season? Not real sure what to expect. I kinda get the feeling that he did not have overwhelming support from his guys
Our defensive play in the 4th quarter was more about the Whorns going conservative than about OU's defense playing better. Texas went conservative and we stopped them 3 times in a row. We tie up the game. Texas gets out of their conservative mode and drive down the field on the last possession the same way they did in the first half. Score - game over.I'm not saying that Mike getting into a fist fight with a team member was appropriate ...... but you gotta admit they played a little better in the second half. LOL
I remember when OU thought Venables was the problem.
I don’t care who you put coaching the defense, until you recruit better defensive players nothing will change! I’m sorry but a coach that was the DC at tech is damn sure not the answer. Have to have better players. Especially on the D line!
I don’t care who you put coaching the defense, until you recruit better defensive players nothing will change! I’m sorry but a coach that was the DC at tech is damn sure not the answer. Have to have better players. Especially on the D line!
Brent V is a front 7 guy. Both Mike and Bobo are back 7 guys. Brent got tired of fighting both Bob and Bobo. Plus he grew into a better defensive guy then both Bob and Bobo. Then add, Brent is better at sniffing out talent at LB then either Stoops. And of course he played LB, something neither Stoops played.
Bob and Mike will take a chance on a DB way before they will take a chance on a Dlinemen.
Right now it's just important to simplify the defense and let players play. They were fundamentally sound, playing in a vanilla D, against FAU and UCLA. The huge problems didn't come until we opened the play book against ISU. If you have to think about what to do, then you don't know. Way to many one or two position react schemes. That's a DB, LB, Dline having to adjust on the fly, depending upon what one or two position do.
A DB pushes the outside edge, if the DE crashes the edge but the LB has to slid over to fill the gap. But the LB doesn't so now he has to think, instead of play. That does not come naturally and takes 100's of reps to flow. Then they are thinking and not playing just the fundamentals. ie tackling, or void fill.
Just look at Bolton sack, The DE gets manhandle and Bolton is suppose to gap or void fill. He went for the void and the DE, getting manhandled, that took away the Texass screen. So he gave up void and went for the sack. That was a busted play on the D. That wasn't a delayed blitz but an out and out busted play on our D, that we just got lucky. He's a 5th year senior so that experience, might have helped but he had a clear path and sat for an extra second, before he committed. We got lucky.
I don’t care who you put coaching the defense, until you recruit better defensive players nothing will change! I’m sorry but a coach that was the DC at tech is damn sure not the answer. Have to have better players. Especially on the D line!