Everything doesn't always "fit". Huepel isn't clueless to the game, he just didn't fit. And there was no place he could've coached that would've come with more expectations as a previous legend and national title winner.
Watching us last season, it was obvious we had talent, so what we've done this season is not a shock now that these guys are playing for each other and having fun. With just a few new pieces and some different moves on the board we've grown leaps and bounds.
The consensus was to bench Mayfield during the Tenn game???? Man do you actually believe what you type? You are either highly delusional or just out right lying. Neither is a good thingHeupel didn't have John Frickin Wayne as a QB.
Seriously, last year and EVERY year we have talent...we are Oklahoma. THIS year, we have:
And if you were trying to defend Heupel and/or me...no need to. We said goodbye to our first JFW whose offenses averaged 40 pts per game and kept Coach Mike whose defenses were giving up almost that. Since I used the exact same type of facts to defend Kevin Wilson when the masses wanted his head and Heupel calling plays...well you know.
- Depth on defense. DLine, LBs, and DBs.
- John Frickin Wayne. His skill has helped offset our BIGGEST weakness...an inexperienced OLine.
- A healthy Shephard AND a few others that can catch the dang ball!
- On field leadership. See JFW above.
Through the Tennesee game, the consensus here was to bench JFW, Coach Mike should be burned at the stake, and Coach Stoops should be encouraged to find another place of employment.
Some saw John Frickin Wayne and a team that just continued to improve every week on both sides of the ball and were pretty darn good with a LOT of potential. The more things change, the more they remain the same.
It's been a fun year....the board is fun again, we won another Championship after a 3-year drought and we're playing for an NC again. One we should win.
And when we don't win back to back next year, well....the more things change....
LOL.
No not really. And I'm not attacking Plaino as a person, simply debunking his thinking that it's all about players making plays or not. It's absurd. The average fan in the stands with a lick of common sense could see changes needed to be made the last few seasons. Bob made them, and look at the difference in the product on the field. Sorry, but the evidence in the outcomes after coaching changes in the OU staff is absolutely definitive that Plaino's stance on this over the last few years was dead wrong.If only you could see how constantly attacking Plaino show the opposite.
Well, I can't remember if it was the Tennessee game or not, but I do remember some outcries in game threads about putting in Trevor to see if he could do better. There were even some of the old "I miss Landry" comments as well. So the Baker love OU fans have now, wasn't always there at the start of the season.No one here was asking for Mayfield to be benched during the Tennessee game, that's an outright lie.
I should go back and see what I posted and how I felt back in January right after the bowl game. People can evolve and change opinions and thinking about things as events unfold. So wondering if I were to read now what I posted in January, if I would call myself a moron or not. lolOne of the nice things about this new Rivals user interface might also one of the bad things for some. Old posts will never be deleted (unless the author or admin deletes or edits them). They're all there - going back to January 2015. Lots of research material available to see if things were really said or not. So if being right is really that important, start linking some old threads.
Don't try and blame your simpleton views of the OU football staff on others that you feel you have to lower your intelligence level to theirs. Your stance on coaches in the past has been wrong and incredibly flawed. Nothing wrong with admitting it. Even these 4 or 5 "simpletons" as you call them could even see there were issues within the staff. You see..sometimes just a little bit of common sense is what's needed, rather than trying to apply some sort of self-perceived higher intelligence about these situations.
OK, PtLavaca...Who are YOU? Deliberate, or Clueless?
Senior, you don't have a clue how to wager. You should have made it for a hundred bucks at a minimum given the better than average odds someone will do one or the other.
Well, I can't remember if it was the Tennessee game or not, but I do remember some outcries in game threads about putting in Trevor to see if he could do better. There were even some of the old "I miss Landry" comments as well. So the Baker love OU fans have now, wasn't always there at the start of the season.
No not really. And I'm not attacking Plaino as a person, simply debunking his thinking that it's all about players making plays or not. It's absurd. The average fan in the stands with a lick of common sense could see changes needed to be made the last few seasons. Bob made them, and look at the difference in the product on the field. Sorry, but the evidence in the outcomes after coaching changes in the OU staff is absolutely definitive that Plaino's stance on this over the last few years was dead wrong.
And ya know ST, it's easy for you to accuse me of attacking, when in actuality it's Plaino that enjoys telling posters that can apply blame to coaches (as well as players) are stupid, idiots, or just don't have a clue what they are talking about. Sorry, but since the results on the field point towards him being wrong, doesn't that mean the adjectives he loves to label others with...maybe they now apply to him???
John Frickin Wayne is the BIGGEST difference in this offense. He's helped hide our biggest weakness....an inexperienced OLine.
Moses considering Sanchez horrid game,
Maybe it's your wordsmithing that causes a lot of consternation with others. You golf-clap when the team does well, and you cry from the heavens when someone makes a mistake.
In the game thread, you made 8 negative posts and only 4 positive posts, another post was a back-handed compliment. You never write with any neutrality or simple observation. There always has to be hyperbole and abject language involved.
You have trouble just making your opinion and then moving on like 97% of the posters do. You have to dig in your heels and refute every challenge. If you're not a lawyer, you missed your calling in life. A good fallback for you might be a Xanax prescription.
Speaking of slam dunks....MY OH MY!!!!!As for fitty, for the love of God think before you post. From your cussing rants, to wishing death on posters to being completely wrong on the Henry issue just the other day. Its awfully hard to respect anything you post. You are the Lee corso of the board and here for entertainment. I will admit though you do make me laugh
ST, I was never on the Fire Heupel train either. Sounds like we both felt about the same in regards to the coordinators last year. I wasn't looking for any coordinator to get fired, but I damn sure felt at the time if one of the them was going to go and I had to pick I would have chosen Mike. Not to say I was for certain he needed to be fired, but the defense last year was by far a bigger problem. But thankfully that decision was left to Bob, and from how this season turned out I think I can safely say i was wrong about which coordinator should go.
But we can agree to disagree agree about Plainos stance on coach vs player blame and fault during awful performances. He consistently states "it's not the coaches, players either make plays or they dont". That is a pretty clear cut statement. I don't think coaches are to blame or are at fault every single time. But they do shoulder blame at time. Same goes with players. Plaino confers with his words that it's all on the players, and putting blame on coaches is idiotic and stupid. Now if Plaino does in fact think fault for losses does also fall on coaches, then I have clearly missed his intent to imply that in his posts. But up till now, I haven't seen it implied.
Biggest difference in our defense too, IMO. Credit to having a CB that can complement Zack too, Jordan Thomas, and moving Striker back to a blitzing linebacker, but Mayfield seems to have been better for our defense than anything. It was all too apparent in the TCU game. Sorry for being un-PC, but our defense looked retarded in the second half against TCU. Riley took the blame for being conservative, but he would have been conservative if Mayfield was in the game too, but I bet the results would have been far different. I mean, the very next week after taking blame for being conservative, Riley went back to being conservative in the second half against OkSt. The results were far different as we outscored OkSt 14-3 in the second half. That was in no small part due to Mayfield.
Mayfield in the second half against OkSt was 4/7 and ran for 44 yards.
Tulsans pride was so hurt he left the board for 6 months...... Enough said
I left the board for 6 months last year. OU was 4-0 when I stopped posting. It wasn't a matter of Sooner losses. It wasn't a matter of pride. It wasn't a matter of being hurt. I simply needed time away. And it was a blissful 8-4 football season. I never looked at the board a single time.
I had dinner with SoonerTulsan before his time away, and I'm pretty certain that is why he took some time off too. But when I returned, WNAS made the same accusation of me that you are making of ST. It isn't right Yankee.
One of the nice things about this new Rivals user interface might also one of the bad things for some. Old posts will never be deleted (unless the author or admin deletes or edits them). They're all there - going back to January 2015. Lots of research material available to see if things were really said or not. So if being right is really that important, start linking some old threads.