That minor detail wasn't noticed by Timmy.
Billy joe bobby timothy is not the sharpest knife in the drawer.
That minor detail wasn't noticed by Timmy.
Oklahoma also ran for 750t against Colorado in 1980.In 1988, OU ran for 768 against KSU.
You guys just remember I told you this. The Clemson Dline will maul your Oline. It will be awful. It's the biggest mismatch in the game.
My son's old 4th grade little league team has a better offense than Florida
Very likely, but so are your comments based on absolutely zero evidence. So I think what I said has as much validity as what you said...and therein lies the point which I am happy that you finally understand...your post is ignorant.
No your post is personal and it's slightly libel in that your dumbass would have to prove what you said to get a pass. So stick to football.
My facts are truthful.
-we are a top 20 unit on both sides of the ball
-we have played two current top 10 teams and beaten them. You have not.
-we have played somewhat to our competition.
-per rivals recruiting rankings, you guys are the 3rd or 4th best team we've played so beating us requires out coaching us bc you do not have more talent, period.
-we have 0 losses and you have 1 and a few close calls. We just have a few close calls. We needed the break after 10 straight games. So if any team has shown tendency for a lapse it's you.
-without Baker your team is maybe a top 25 team but it's doubtful. It will be interesting to see if we try and hit him every play
"No your post is personal and it's slightly libel in that your dumbass would have to prove what you said to get a pass". TimmyBobby..
You're joking, right? It's a message board and I've seen tons of libelous posts over the years and this ain't one.
Zer0, if he sues you for libel I know a good lawyer. Send me a thousand dollars as a retainer..........
I'm not worried about it. I never stated a fact, I asked a question. Mr. Bobby seems to be one of these people that are easily offended. How are you going to come to a message board for another team and start talking crap then get butthurt when someone says something back? I'd love to see what he has to say if he got into a pissing match with Sholtz or whatever that guy's name is over on OB. LOL
So does this mean I'm not going to get my 1000 dollar retainer? If you call me in the next ten minutes, I'll go down to 500 bucks. Free shipping and wait, I'll double my offer, I'll get your next lawsuit representation for free. Just call right now. This offer expires after the bowl game, so don't delay..........
I'm not worried about it. I never stated a fact, I asked a question. Mr. Bobby seems to be one of these people that are easily offended. How are you going to come to a message board for another team and start talking crap then get butthurt when someone says something back? I'd love to see what he has to say if he got into a pissing match with Sholtz or whatever that guy's name is over on OB. LOL
Bo I don't give a shit really, just stick to football.
Bo I don't give a shit really, just stick to football.
You need a good lawyer TB. I know one. Call me in the next ten minutes and he will sue this zer0 guy for libel. I'll take 100 dollar retainer.....
But we were just starting to have fun.
You guys are funny. love the spirit.
Fair enough. I answer my calls from buddy's with things like "blow job confessions, how may I help you?" so it's all good
I'm known as one of the completely serious people here. Why would you answer calls like that?
I have a better question. Why would anybody have a user name with a double first name? Timmy Bobby? it reminds me of some guy that jumped off the Talhatechee bridge. BillyJoe McAlester..................
This just got really weird.Fair enough. I answer my calls from buddy's with things like "blow job confessions, how may I help you?" so it's all good
Fair enough. I answer my calls from buddy's with things like "blow job confessions, how may I help you?" so it's all good
I'm known as one of the completely serious people here. Why would you answer calls like that?
I have a better question. Why would anybody have a user name with a double first name? Timmy Bobby? it reminds me of some guy that jumped off the Talhatechee bridge. Billy Joe McAlester..................
Even weirder.To give my buddy who is a homophobe a hard time
Reminds me of DeliveranceI have a better question. Why would anybody have a user name with a double first name? Timmy Bobby? it reminds me of some guy that jumped off the Talhatechee bridge. Billy Joe McAlester..................
I'm known as one of the completely serious people here. Why would you answer calls like that?
Tic toc, time for a sooner ass whippin
We do enjoy administering those. That's what you are looking forward to?
To give my buddy who is a homophobe a hard time
Apparently we should have put an external lock on his closet door.I think we're learning alot about TimmyBobby today.
My facts are truthful.
-we are a top 20 unit on both sides of the ball
Those aren't all facts. Most are stats. And stats are like whores...once you get them down, you can make them say or do anything you want.
For instance, take your top stat ; "we are a top 20 unit on both sides of the ball". It may also be factual, but it's more of a stat. And let me show you why.
Facts are basically indisputable. In that the meaning of the statement retains its validity in all, or even most all, situations. Water is wet. That's pretty much a factual statement, because in almost every conceivable setting, water will be wet.
Your reasoning of why Clemson will beat OU hinges, in part, on the statistic that Clemson is ranked in the top twenty on both sides of the ball. That's a very vague statement. Which statistic are you using for that statement, as there are several statistics on each side of the ball? And what is the statistical significance between that arbitrary value (twenty) and whatever place OU currently resides in that same statistical category? And what is the value for the teams that you have played to establish the place of each statistic?
Here are some randomly arbitrary statistics for "each side of the ball" for each team. If you are using a different set of statistics, please let me know so we can discuss apples to apples.
...........................................Clemson........................OU
Rush offense:........................22/222 ypg...............15/235 ypg
Pass Offense:........................24/288 ypg...............18/307 ypg
Total Offense:........................11/510 ypg...............06/542 ypg
Scoring Offense:....................16/38 ppg.................02/45 ppg
Just using your metric, we beat you in every conceivable offensive category. But does that still tell the whole story? Not really. Because while we're ranked seven spots ahead of you in rushing yards a game, which is pretty significant, we're only averaging three more rushing yards a game than you guys. Is that a number someone could hang their hat on and say "We're going to beat you because we run the ball better than you."? I think we'd all agree, probably not. The biggest advantage OU has in these numbers is in the Scoring offense. We're averaging seven more points per game than you guys. Is that statistically significant? Possibly. A lot of other things have to be taken into account. Such as these statistics:
...........................................Clemson........................OU
Rush Defense:.......................24/128 ypg..............42/149 ypg
Pass Defense:.......................05/166 ypg..............32/201 ypg
Total Defense:.......................07/295 ypg..............30/350 ypg
Scoring Defense:...................18/20 ppg................22/20 ppg
You beat us in every conceivable defensive category. And in some categories, it's a pretty significant advantage for Clemson. OU is giving up over 55 yards a game more than Clemson. That, to me, sounds pretty significant. At least until we go back up and look at the only real statistic that counted above: scoring. Because games aren't won or lost on rushing yardage given up. They're won because one team scores more than the other. I think we can all agree on that concept.
And if we look at that metric, we both are giving up 20 ppg, but OU is scoring seven more points per game on average.
Not to "Jenni Carlson" you, but I'm going to leave that statement by itself. Because of all the other statistical categories, that one speaks the loudest.
Now, there are about 1,000 more things that go into those statistics. For instance, if Team A played three of the top five passing teams in the nation, you'd think their passing defense ranking would be very high. It stands to reason the better offensive teams you play, the worse you're going to look defensively. So let's look at the top tour (very arbitrary number on my part, I admit) offenses each team played. To keep this discussion consistent, I'll stick with the Scoring Offense category.
Clemson
North Carolina.............10/40 ppg
Appalachian State........23/36 ppg
Notre Dame..................31/34 ppg
North Carolina State.....39/33 ppg
OU
Baylor............................01/48 ppg
Texas Tech...................03/45 ppg
TCU...............................08/41 ppg
OSU...............................09/41 ppg
The top four offensive teams OU played this year are ranked head of even the top team Clemson faced. What could that tell someone? One possible finding we could take from that is that OU's defense has played tougher offensive opponents than Clemson has, and yet they still have given up the same amount of points per game.
Again, there are tons more variables that go into this discussion, and in all honesty, my dissertation on this would span over 100 pages on just those variables. But I think you get my gist: that your stated number one reason or Clemson beating OU was due to your belief in some sort of statistical dominance you guys have over us, and I've shown that to be false. And by false, I mean totally not true in any way, shape, or form, and actually to be in OU's favor.
Any other "football" discussions you'd like to have?