“There’s no reason, no fricking reason, why Ohio State should go ahead of Oklahoma, and pee on our rug. Am I right?”
I like the four team format.
I like making the regular season mean as much as possible, even with the controversy.
And if teams are tired of Alabama's dominance....then copy them and beat them. Bama is the proven template for success, with or without ESPN being under Saban's desk.
“There’s no reason, no fricking reason, why Ohio State should go ahead of Oklahoma, and pee on our rug. Am I right?”
Damn right, Dude. There are RULES!
Will have to wait and see how the playoff rankings look. But if it reflects today's poll then OU has nothing to worry about. OU just needs to win and they are in.Big if on beating Texas, but if we win and if Ohio State wins, we will have beaten a higher ranked team in our CCG.
Will have to wait and see how the playoff rankings look. But if it reflects today's poll then OU has nothing to worry about. OU just needs to win and they are in.
Good post. I will add that while firing Mike in 2017 would have been better, replacing him with a top notch defensive coach should have been done then as well.
I do not believe fixing OU's defense will be an overnight fix. I think it will be a 2-3 year task that: 1) acclimates the coach with the talent already available, 2) reloading with talented AND COACHABLE players who play tough and smart and 3) having a coach who can sell OU's new commitment to defensive excellence to prospects.
Will have to wait and see how the playoff rankings look. But if it reflects today's poll then OU has nothing to worry about. OU just needs to win and they are in.
I want to add to my post without an edit. Maybe not cool but I want to make a point. OU once had what Alabama has today. It didn’t just happen. It started when Jim Mackenzie was named OU head coach. If you ask any Sooner player that was already on campus before Mac, they will tell you how the culture immediately changed and what Mac put them through. It wasn’t the as brutal as what Bear Bryant did with his first Texas A&M team but it was really tough. Mac set the tone. Switzer continued. What resulted was wins, championships and that got Barry the pick of the best Wishbone talent in the country for many years. Barry also recruited some of the best defensive players for his excellent coaches to develop. Great players on both sides of the ball coached well. Barry just wasn’t tough enough to maintain Mac’s “template” after a while.
I believe there will be no fixing the OU defense to the level of play that it was or has been in the past. In fact, not even close. Look around. Saban has actually adopted the wide open offense. He sees the future. Some of the smartest defensive coaches and some of the best defensive players are getting beaten each week. In two to three years, there will be more and more teams adopting the wise open offenses. Until some defensive guru comes up with a plan to stop these wide open offenses, they will flourish and continue to gain acceptance.
Exactly. But like the Wishbone, someone will figure out how to slow down these wide open offenses. Just a matter of time. I wish OU could be the first. lol
Good post. Another thing about The King; Think about the number of players he recruited that were offensive players in high school who ended up being great defensive players at OU. Randy Hughes, Scot Hill, David Vickers, etc...
I'm not sure. This type of offense was spurred in action to take advantage of the rules. Rules that were put in place to protect the QB, & the defenseless WR. They were put place to limit or change the way a defensive player can hit, attack, and/or tackle. Football is so different today than just 10 years ago. Add to this additional rules to be added for further protection of players... what we have here is an offensive game.
I'm not sure. This type of offense was spurred in action to take advantage of the rules. Rules that were put in place to protect the QB, & the defenseless WR. They were put place to limit or change the way a defensive player can hit, attack, and/or tackle. Football is so different today than just 10 years ago. Add to this additional rules to be added for further protection of players... what we have here is an offensive game.
If OU gets back to winning National Titles I don't care if the defense gives up 900 yds a game and not a single fan from any other School would either. At Thanksgiving Dinner there was an Arkie fan there saying the Big 12 does not play defense, I laughed and said I guess being 2-10 is better than 11-1. Lmao.
After watching the potential playoff teams the past few days I say bring any one of them on, none of them are unbeatable. Line up and see what happens. Gotta get by that team from asstin first tho.
None of this bellyaching would exist if OU had played any decent defense this year.
We're talking EXPANDED playoffs.I've heard this before... 'making the regular season mean something'. I'm not sure I understand it to be honest. How does having a playoff system make regular season games meaningless?
Expanding the playoffs will not make the regular season meaningless. You're going to have to win games during the regular season in order to make the playoffs. With the system we have now, it still comes down to peoples opinion on who deserves to be one of the 4 teams. Make it a 16 team playoff and don't use a committee to select the teams. Select them on the merits of their season.
Expanding the playoffs will not make the regular season meaningless. You're going to have to win games during the regular season in order to make the playoffs. With the system we have now, it still comes down to peoples opinion on who deserves to be one of the 4 teams. Make it a 16 team playoff and don't use a committee to select the teams. Select them on the merits of their season.
Yes, but unfortunately, he cannot discuss OU at all, and must leave the room when OU comes up. There's a 2nd person on the committee that also has OU ties, and has to leave the room when OU comes up. That leaves use 2 committee folks short to discuss OU, and open to 1 person with a tOSU agenda to blow holes in our resume.Isn't Joe C on the Football Committee? He will talk common sense with them.
It also leaves us with 2 to blow holes in tOSU's resume' when their AD has to step out of the room when the Buckeye's name comes up.Yes, but unfortunately, he cannot discuss OU at all, and must leave the room when OU comes up. There's a 2nd person on the committee that also has OU ties, and has to leave the room when OU comes up. That leaves use 2 committee folks short to discuss OU, and open to 1 person with a tOSU agenda to blow holes in our resume.
TOSU now has a 44% chance to make the playoffs ( 54% by winning the BCCG) while
OU is now just at 37%.
Bottom line is if ESPN has its way OU will not get in over TOSU. Guess they forgot about the epic Purdue beatdown. Just something to talk about over this next week because if OU loses it won’t matter anyway.
Dont be surprised if Tuesdays rankings has TOSU at 5 with OU remaining at 6. I know it isnt going to surprise me.
It's an easy fix. Take the Power 5 champs and 3 at large. Max two teams from any one conference. That leaves room for the Notre Dames and UCFs of the world.
It's an easy fix. Take the Power 5 champs and 3 at large. Max two teams from any one conference. That leaves room for the Notre Dames and UCFs of the world.
I said the 4-team format would make the regular MORE meaningful...........not "meaningless".Expanding the playoffs will not make the regular season meaningless. You're going to have to win games during the regular season in order to make the playoffs. With the system we have now, it still comes down to peoples opinion on who deserves to be one of the 4 teams. Make it a 16 team playoff and don't use a committee to select the teams. Select them on the merits of their season.
The problem with 6 is that your at large will always be a 2nd SEC team. Gives no opportunity for any non-P5 to make it. I do feel a 7 or 8 seed at large has a shot, any given year - probably more than the lowest rated P5 champ (e.g. Pac 12 champ this year).I've always liked the 6 team idea. Power5 plus one at large.
#1 and #2 get first round byes as a reward.
Has anyone ever believed #7 or #8 have a chance at being the best?