Hope the Cadets continue their Winning Ways for their Bowl Game...
Army VS Houston...2:30...espin...
Army VS Houston...2:30...espin...
WP76, I have a feeling Army will "close it out" today.Historically, Army has won five of seven bowl games with the two losses to Alabama and Auburn by a total of four points. If they can close this one out, it'll give the Cadets an eleven win season which is something not even the three-peat national champions of 1944-45-46 can claim. The fact that we're curb-stomping an Opie Applewhite-coached team is just icing on the cake.
Bottom line is the the boys from West Point are pretty good--something to which our Sooners can attest.
In Your Dreeeeams, CT!WP76, I have a feeling Army will "close it out" today.
Hope that now that I've entered my 70th year I can see Army maintain its current upswing until I'm shot to death at age 93 by a jealous husband.
WP76, I have a feeling Army will "close it out" today.
Hope that now that I've entered my 70th year I can see Army maintain its current upswing until I'm shot to death at age 93 by a jealous husband.
Army's 2019 schedule, outside of an away game at Michigan, is pretty weak. Another ten win season is very possible. There are road games at Air Force and Hawaii and Navy on December 14th, but that pretty much highlights the slate.CT you're in for a treat at West Point next year; we're all jealous.
True, but what other opponent won ten games....and soon to win 11 ?
remember a few years ago when Houston beat us and thought they were on their way to becoming a powerhouse?
I got the opportunity to watch most of this game. Off topic: Many of the players/cadets had tattoos. These lads will be officers in the US Army. I served with an officer that was West Point grad. Tats were taboo for officers in my day.
I totally agree but that’s pretty weak sauce and a testimonial to the state of the Big12 Conference.At WVa & the CCG were pretty impressive also
Yep that same UH coach moved on and beat us again.remember a few years ago when Houston beat us and thought they were on their way to becoming a powerhouse?
I am often told that because I'm 70 that I am "old school" when it comes to things like rap "music", tattoos, silly end zone celebrations, bat flips....things like sportsmanship and civility.Yes, as a former Army officer, I disliked the tats on the players. It may be a generational thing but I find tats unbecoming and especially for Commissioned Officers who are appointed by the President. It may come to harm them in the future when promotion boards are convened and their photo is on full display in their promotion file. But I am old school.
Maybe. But if they don't happen the Sooners don't have the first back to back Heissmen QB's ever and aren't in the final 4 two years in a row... One game at a time and Merry Christmas !I totally agree but that’s pretty weak sauce and a testimonial to the state of the Big12 Conference.
Yep that same UH coach moved on and beat us again.
Come on Sirs??? I'm a Retired NCO and there's nothing wrong with tatoos that can be covered by wearing everyday clothes and uniforms. I agree tats on the neck or hands is unbecoming of all soldiers, not just officers. But even a "sleeve" on the arm from shoulder to wrist can be covered by the daily bdu's or acu's or whatever fatigues are called today. That's my opinion only but just thought I'd voice it. Merry Xmas to you guys and all US service men & woman around the world...Yes, as a former Army officer, I disliked the tats on the players. It may be a generational thing but I find tats unbecoming and especially for Commissioned Officers who are appointed by the President. It may come to harm them in the future when promotion boards are convened and their photo is on full display in their promotion file. But I am old school.
I understand things change and so does public opinion. I always viewed tats as a fashion statement. My reasoning for not having tats is the same reason I don't have platform shoes or hip hugger bell bottom pants in my closet. I grew up when tats were out of style. My father did not have tattoos. I spent 5 years and 8 months in the army in the early 70s. I was asked at both E-5 and E-6 promotion boards if I had tats. My MOS gave me the opportunity to consider promotion to Warrant Officer if I decided to stay. Tattoos were a disqualifier to this particular WO program.Come on Sirs??? I'm a Retired NCO and there's nothing wrong with tattoos that can be covered by wearing everyday clothes and uniforms. I agree tats on the neck or hands is unbecoming of all soldiers, not just officers. But even a "sleeve" on the arm from shoulder to wrist can be covered by the daily bdu's or acu's or whatever fatigues are called today. That's my opinion only but just thought I'd voice it. Merry Xmas to you guys and all US service men & woman around the world...