Yes they are.They have solid QB play, the game's best WR, can keep a defense honest with their run game and a defense that's well coached. I wouldn't have said this previously, but now I don't see any reason they can't beat either Pittsburgh or New England.
I smell a wager.No one is beating New England.
I'd rather smell an upset.I smell a wager.
Falcons are pretty solid up and down the lineup, and if any team can beat the Pats it's this one. However, but when it comes to the SB, I'm not sure I'd be comfortable betting against the Pats.I'd rather smell an upset.
I think Atlanta is the more talented team, but I'm not sure they'll win. A lot is going to depend how the DB play is officiated. New England will hold and hang onto Falcon receivers like they haven't been season.
It's hard to bet against the Patriots, who have lost one of their last 12 games since Brady returned from suspension. Hard to bet against Belichick. Brady hasn't been perfect in Super Bowls. The Giants got him twice.
Two or more DPI's against the Patriots and I think the Falcons might win going away. But if the game is officiated with the "let em play" philosophy, then nobody plays that game better than New England.
Good observations Plaino. The Falcons do have some guys that can catch the ball and their passing game is not all just Ryan to Julio Jones, but that certainly is a big part of their scheme. If he can spread the ball around and the refs don't let it become a free-for-all in the defensive backfield, the Falcon's O should be able to be incredibly effective. However, if they do "let the boys play," it could be a long and frustrating night for Ryan and the Falcon WRs. And as you noted, NEVER count out Belichek and the Pats' D.