I say they will enter the first week at number 9 with either Baylor or Minnesota at 10. At least this first poll will give us a good indication of how OU is looked at by this committee.
OU was one and done in the CFP the past few years with two of OU's greatest QBs and with very weak defensive units....and this year, with Hurts, who's clearly not on the same level as his predecessors, and with a defense that's in the process of being reinvented with a long road ahead in becoming championship caliber....has me believing this 2019 team should not be playoff bound by any stretch of the imagination.It's nothing more than a curiosity for me. The Sooner's loss came too late in the season to recover. Also, I've never been into bashing student athletes or the coaches, so this isn't a bash, just the truth... our defense simply doesn't belong in the playoffs.
Number 8 in the updated Coaches Poll. Baylor 10? Omfg.
The opponent winning percentage list was quite compelling. I guess other teams could stumble worse than what we did in Manhattan. We have to win out convincingly. Hope LR and Grinch realize the foot has to be on the gas pedal for us to have any looks by the Committee. Still #1 in total offense so that should count for something.
OU was one and done in the CFP the past few years with two of OU's greatest QBs and with very weak defensive units....and this year, with Hurts, who's clearly not on the same level as his predecessors, and with a defense that's in the process of being reinvented with a long road ahead in becoming championship caliber....has me believing this 2019 team should not be playoff bound by any stretch of the imagination.
In other words, Grinch needs more time and Rattler needs to play up to his perceived potential before OU can realistically talk about #8.
I think we saw our last playoff appearance for a while last year. Suits me just fine until the Defense gets their act together.
I think the SEC gets 2 teams in, LSU and Bama. If they could get three in they would.
Then tOSU and Clemson.
What a mess it will be if there are 3 one loss sec teams, doubtful but could happen. Georgia has that bad loss to South Carolina though.
I have also noticed over the years sec teams move up in the polls the fastest and don't drop as far after a loss.
At this point I just hope we win out and get a good bowl thats a good matchup for us.
I’m thinking we play the best SEC team not in the playoffs.
Yep, if we win out it could be Georgia.
I think Bama beats LSU in a close game and Bama wins the SEC CG vs Georgia.
LSU and Bama will both get in most likely.
Add that to the reasons this 2019 team is not ready for the CFP.Hurts would play better with last year’s offensive line and Riley would call a better game, too. Just saying.
Yep, if we win out it could be Georgia.
I think Bama beats LSU in a close game and Bama wins the SEC CG vs Georgia.
LSU and Bama will both get in most likely.
if the LSU - Bama loser still gets in over another 12-1 P5 champ then the committee is sending the same message the AP and Coaches do. That message being that the letters SEC mean more to them than actual data. The link below is over at the main board and an Alabama loss should pretty much end the debate. That would leave Bama with only one possible win ( Auburn) if they won out from there over a quality opponent. LSU would have a case if they lost but Alabama doesn’t have a leg to stand on if they lose.
https://forums.rivals.com/threads/alabama-has-apparently-played-the-easiest-schedule.900402/
The argument is that Oregon lost to SEC Auburn which didn’t come close to winning the conference. Not my argument but one that will be made nonetheless if questioned about it. Nothing much will be said about it being a 27-20 score in August.
if the LSU - Bama loser still gets in over another 12-1 P5 champ then the committee is sending the same message the AP and Coaches do. That message being that the letters SEC mean more to them than actual data. The link below is over at the main board and an Alabama loss should pretty much end the debate. That would leave Bama with only one possible win ( Auburn) if they won out from there over a quality opponent. LSU would have a case if they lost but Alabama doesn’t have a leg to stand on if they lose.
https://forums.rivals.com/threads/alabama-has-apparently-played-the-easiest-schedule.900402/
I just don't want to play LSU in New Orleans. But it could happen.
The last time we played LSU in Nawlins, it was the worst fan experience ever for the majority of Sooner fans who went there. LSU fans were despicable. Anybody else is fine. LSU anywhere else is fine. LSU in New Orleans is a horrible experience for a bowl game, which is supposed to be fun.I would have no issue with OU playing either LSU, Alabama or UGA in the Sugar if they get there. I look at this way, say the committee puts 2 SEC teams in and OU beats either a 1 loss LSU or Bama while UGA defeats the other in the SEC CCG to make 3 SEC teams finish 12-1.
A OU victory over either sends the message that the committee left out a very deserving OU team as a conference champion just so they could put 2 SEC teams in. This could very well have a ripple effect in future selection processes.
I Hate the current system process because we are allowing and even accepting allowing a group of humans to decide who gets a shot and who doesn’t and you can’t convince me that bias doesn’t exist in that room. Bottom line is it needs to be no less than a 8 team playoff where all 5 P5 conference champions are represented, 1 G5 as long as they are either 13-0 or 12-1 ( Include ND with this group since they refuse to join a conference ) and 2 WC. Take the selection process out of the hands of humans and make conf championships mean something again.
AmenOU was one and done in the CFP the past few years with two of OU's greatest QBs and with very weak defensive units....and this year, with Hurts, who's clearly not on the same level as his predecessors, and with a defense that's in the process of being reinvented with a long road ahead in becoming championship caliber....has me believing this 2019 team should not be playoff bound by any stretch of the imagination.
In other words, Grinch needs more time and Rattler needs to play up to his perceived potential before OU can realistically talk about #8.
But then they couldn't manipulate the final standings. It's the biggest crock, I agree, why play a CCG if there's not a guarantee for a playoff spot for the victor?Should only be one team max from each conference...ain’t that what a conference championship should decide anyways?
On top of that, Texas lost to the worst OU team in my lifetime, giving John Blake is first win, after four losses to start his first season.I guess I'm in the minority on this, because I'll go to my grave believing a team such as '96 Texas (they won the inaugural B12 CCG in that upset over NU) who lost 4 regular season games (& a 5th when they got their hat handed to them in Tempe by Penn St.) has any place in the discussion for a natty.
I guess I'm in the minority on this, because I'll go to my grave believing a team such as '96 Texas (they won the inaugural B12 CCG in that upset over NU) who lost 4 regular season games (& a 5th when they got their hat handed to them in Tempe by Penn St.) has any place in the discussion for a natty.
The last time we played LSU in Nawlins, it was the worst fan experience ever for the majority of Sooner fans who went there. LSU fans were despicable. Anybody else is fine. LSU anywhere else is fine. LSU in New Orleans is a horrible experience for a bowl game, which is supposed to be fun.