ADVERTISEMENT

Those that barely make it..............

http://www.sciencetimes.com/article...res-risen-in-the-us-over-the-last-century.htm

"Over the last centuries, as school enrollment rates increased, so did students' exposure to activities that had a profound influence on brain development and thinking skills. Although today there is the widespread perception that the quality of school education is waning, in reality, the shift from memorization-focused learning to problem solving and abstract thinking skills has increased what he refers to as our liquid intelligence. The latter refers to the flexible thinking and abstract problem solving that scores high on IQ tests."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390444032404578006612858486012

"This progression signals a growing ability to cope with formal education, not just in algebra but also in the humanities. Consider the exam questions that schools posed to 14-year-olds in 1910 and 1990. The earlier exams were all about socially valuable information: What were the capitals of the 45 states? Later tests were all about relationships: Why is the capital of many states not the largest city? Rural-dominated state legislatures hated big cities and chose Albany over New York, Harrisburg over Philadelphia, and so forth.

Our lives are utterly different from those led by most Americans before 1910. The average American went to school for less than six years and then worked long hours in factories, shops or agriculture. The only artificial images they saw were drawings or photographs. Aside from basic arithmetic, nonverbal symbols were restricted to musical notation (for an elite) and playing cards. Their minds were focused on ownership, the useful, the beneficial and the harmful."
 
I guess we're all doomed then, and the human race will come to a standstill based on your anecdotal evidence. We're getting dumber and dumber despite the facts.
Give me a list of non left-leaning publications that you accept, and I'll find you similar data.
I guess you are one of those guys who has to have the last word on everything.

Good luck with that.
 
I just know how to argue with facts and evidence rather than opinions and anecdotes. And based on Dastardly Deed classifying me as part of the 1% on which the rest of the world tags along, I'd say I've had great luck with that trait.

:eek:
 
Last edited:
I just know how to argue with facts and evidence rather than opinions and anecdotes. And based on Sybarite classifying me as part of the 1% on which the rest of the world tags along, I'd say I've had great luck with that trait.

:eek:
Your ego is something else. Do you kiss the mirror every morning?

Again. Good Luck with that.

You going to get the last word in again?
 
I thought the same thing initially, then after hearing him speak a few times, it dawned on me that his ego is too big to play second-fiddle to anyone. Even his old friends, the Clintons.

Oh, you are so right, Schoonerman. This is going to end up a train wreck and the country the loser.
 
Oh, you are so right, Schoonerman. This is going to end up a train wreck and the country the loser.


90.jpeg
 
Your ego is something else. Do you kiss the mirror every morning?

Again. Good Luck with that.

You going to get the last word in again?

And again, if you want an intelligent argument devoid of opinions and anecdote, I can provide you with that. I've yet to see you do the same, but I do like how you meander down the path of insults. I'll take it as long as you'll dish it. :p
 
And again, if you want an intelligent argument devoid of opinions and anecdote, I can provide you with that. I've yet to see you do the same, but I do like how you meander down the path of insults. I'll take it as long as you'll dish it. :p
It would seem that the 1% man has all of the time in the world to fight with people on the net. Why waste such a great ego on the poor message boards? You should be out speaking to your fans and the mass crowds you must command. When is your next speech? Where is going to be held? Why don't you lecture someone who will nod their head and agree with you?

Sounds like you are an attorney or work in education or some firm that feeds of of education.

Good luck with that.
 
Not all, but many, college athletes get pretty weak (easy) degrees. Not exactly chemists, engineers, or doctors.

This is true of most college degrees and college students. If you pick an easy/pointless major, college work is pretty easy, maybe part-time efforts for a full course-load. For more technically challenging degrees, a single class may be a full time job in itself.

One day I was in a 'business college' pre-requisite course, where a business college major sitting next to me suddenly was startled from his bong-induced fog when the professor announced the course final exam was beginning.

Bonghead alarmingly tapped on my shoulder and asked if I had an extra pencil he could borrow.
 
Last edited:
It would seem that the 1% man has all of the time in the world to fight with people on the net. Why waste such a great ego on the poor message boards? You should be out speaking to your fans and the mass crowds you must command. When is your next speech? Where is going to be held? Why don't you lecture someone who will nod their head and agree with you?

Sounds like you are an attorney or work in education or some firm that feeds of of education.

Good luck with that.

I'll take that as a resounding no, you don't want intelligent discussion devoid of opinion and anecdote.

It's funny to me that all insults are originating from yourself, none from myself, and yet you're proclaiming me as an internet fighter. Ironic isn't it?

Your lack of understanding of the 1% tongue-in-cheek comment shows to me that you're an infrequent reader of SoonerScoop as well. If that's the statement that has you all twisted, I will direct you to the definition of sarcasm - "the use of irony to mock or convey contempt."

And if academic discussions twist you as well, perhaps it behooves you to embrace avoidance.
 
I'll take that as a resounding no, you don't want intelligent discussion devoid of opinion and anecdote.

It's funny to me that all insults are originating from yourself, none from myself, and yet you're proclaiming me as an internet fighter. Ironic isn't it?

Your lack of understanding of the 1% tongue-in-cheek comment shows to me that you're an infrequent reader of SoonerScoop as well. If that's the statement that has you all twisted, I will direct you to the definition of sarcasm - "the use of irony to mock or convey contempt."

And if academic discussions twist you as well, perhaps it behooves you to embrace avoidance.
What a tool.
 
I'm listening.
Do you have anything "published" showing your research in the area. Surely you have a Ph.D. or you are a Doctorial candidate with your own data in the area. If you could give a cite that can be researched, I would like to read it. Even if you are a co-author that would be fine.

If you merely are wanting to argue or give your opinion on other people's work, it is just that. It is your opinion. Trying to be an expert on other's work is really no differs than anecdotes etc. or personal experiences that you claim that I gave. Maybe you are an attorney who thinks he has to argue his biased opinion. Just say so.

As I have a son, brother, and brother-in-law who are Ph.D.'s, I can readily find your published work. Even if you have surveys, etc that you have prepared in the area, I would gladly look at it. Anything to show that you have more than an opinion or generated off of other people's work.

Please provide the cite and in the next week or so I will review it while I am traveling.

I'm waiting.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT