Your right about the crappy D but wrong about Hurts. His play Saturday was not great and he is lucky not to have been picked 3 other times and one that should have been a pick 6. The first TD was lucky it wasn’t an INT. Its not hate on Hurts from me as much as it seems he lacks that ability to stand in the pocket without getting happy feet way to quickly.
I realize he has been important to this team but do we really know if Rattler had been playing and getting that valuable playing time we still wouldn’t be at 8-1? It’s all speculation really on any of our parts. Your right the D is the main problem but lately the problem also falls on Riley and his offensive play calling lately and lack of execution by the offense. That entire second half the offense was not good.
I think we were fortunate to go up 35-14 at the half as it could have very well been a 14-14 game if ISU makes those INT or worse 21-14 ISU lead. The O was far from great Saturday as they were more lucky than great. Just my opinion but I am sure others see me as being wrong.
Hurts is here for a reason, mainly I think because Riley knew we did not have a QB on Campus already that could give us a shot this year at a BIG 12 Championship or NC.
Rattler was not ready otherwise why would Riley pursue Hurts to come to OU?
Riley probably also knew our defense would not improve much this year over the past few years and believed Hurts would give us the best chance at winning the Big 12 and see what happens with the playoffs. He also likely knew with the soft schedule that Hurts gave him a chance at 3 straight Heisman QB's which looks damn good on a resume. He is paid more than we will earn in 100 lifetimes so I would guess that speculation on whether Rattler would have us at 8-1 vs where Hurts might take us is out the window, he knew the best chance we had this year was with Hurts. Just my 2 cents.