His name is Robison, not Robinson.
It doesn't matter......except that his name isn't Robinson.WTF does that matter now?
It doesn't matter......except that his name isn't Robinson.
No one is offended.Not my fault that his parents don't know how to spell, but congratulations for deciphering to whom I was referring.
Next time I see a little news tidbit, I'll refrain from posting it for fear of offending the spelling police. It's far from me to want to muddy up this lively message board.
Kool, ia...Do you know 'Swan Song'?By the way, I played Ford Frick in our local community theatre version of the classic plus sang in a lot of the numbers; great fun
Kool, ia...Do you know 'Swan Song'?
The Led Zep version but not the one by Lana Del Rey, sorry...![]()
Just a guess by me: this may mean Austin gets redshirted while Murray plays 2nd string.
I don't recall very many times during Stoops' years that a 3rd string QB ever saw much playing time and I do not believe Riley will change things....and of course, there's the fact that several games will be decided in the 4th quarter, thereby eliminating playing time for 3rd team QB's and most reserves in general.
Sometimes it isn't the public intox that gets you in trouble. It's what you were doing while intoxicated that does...Evidently the rumors are flying. My newphew in OKC just texted me that he heard he got popped for public intox. That cannot be right, can it? Unless it was # 2 for him.
Given Robison's great potential, his misdeed must have been pretty serious or Riley's level of tolerance is lower than his predecessor.
Just my uneducated opinion, but don't think Austin is out of the race for #2 yet, and he did look pretty salty in his limited time last year.
I know the hype train for Kyler Murray has long left the station, I wouldn't be shocked to see Austin as the official #2. I don't think we see a guy play backup, then get redshirted as a sophomore.
Just a hunch.
Nah, not more serious than a PI in the grand scheme of things.More serious than a PI, most likely, but he put himself on short leash early, and in a program that needed to make a statement by the new, incredibly young head coach.
Nah, not more serious than a PI in the grand scheme of things.
When a bull manages to escape the simple fenced area and thinks he's free to do as he pleases, you put the electric fence up as an additional deterrent. When the bull ignores the electric fence and leaves the designated area again, it's time to shoot the bull before he does actual damage.
Or the second offense(s) was just like the first offense minus the arrest, repeated several times until he was found out because of stupid behavior. Sometimes a program is larger than the individual. And sometimes you have to shoot the bull.The decision to dismiss might have had something to do with the kid's attitude towards his first offense. Or his general attitude between then and now. If he lacked remorse or a willingness to admit his mistake and get fully back in step then the second offense was the death blow.
Agree. It will be interesting to see where he goes and how he makes out.Or the second offense(s) was just like the first offense minus the arrest, repeated several times until he was found out because of stupid behavior. Sometimes a program is larger than the individual. And sometimes you have to shoot the bull.
And it's a water heater, driver license, city limit and daylight saving time. If I see veritas59 say anything different, I'm calling him out.
He said he couldn't be in Norman for the summer, then likely showed up, having not worked on his skills and being in shape this summer. To come up for practice, and be dismissed immediately, would indicate that he was given a short leash, but whatever he needed to do, when not "here" he failed to do.Probably was on a short leash after the April incident. I'm sure some team will pick him up.