ADVERTISEMENT

4* WR Velus Jones just screwed OU. He gone. :-)

With or without our best linebacker, Clemson proved to be the better overall team against OU mainly due to its defense (zero points in the second half) and its great (and healthy) quarterback....two things that OU wasn't accustomed to facing last season.
OU wasn't necessarily "manhandled", but was defeated decisively by a better team.
With our best LB, they kicked 3 FGs and scored a TD after a trick play. Without our best LB...they didn't kick many FGs and opened the second half with a long TD drive. Our offense made some key mistakes in the 3rd quarter and the game was over. Obviously, I agree it's ridiculous to say we were "manhandled." The real bottom line is...as Coach Merv said after the game...we just didn't have enough horses to win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Soonersincefitty
have to disagree. Ignorance is when one doesn't know better. Stupid is the other option.


I'd hate to get called "obsessed" if I were to go back and bump the thread with score predictions for the Clemson game. If it were so obvious we didn't match up physically you'd have to think these great visionaries surely picked Clemson to win.

Hmmmm.
 
I'd hate to get called "obsessed" if I were to go back and bump the thread with score predictions for the Clemson game. If it were so obvious we didn't match up physically you'd have to think these great visionaries surely picked Clemson to win.

Hmmmm.


Well, I was going to give you a like Bc, but you're stuck on 666 likes....HA!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT