Will she do the same thing when the swimsuit issue comes out?
When she does, please share with your fellow sooner friends.Oh, God, I hope so.
You talking about the article that makes light of the lack of talent in the league by using NFL draft numbers?be sure to check out the article about the Big 12. Not good.
You talking about the article that makes light of the lack of talent in the league by using NFL draft numbers?
Well hard to imagine SI doesn't think much of the Big XII, when in the same issue it has an article making a case for Okie State making the playoffs.Exactly. Apparently, SI doesn't think much of the B12. Interesting article, IMO.
When she does, please share with your fellow sooner friends.![]()
I miss the old "scratch and sniff" days.Stuff like phone numbers, turn-ons/offs...
Not so fast.Will she do the same thing when the swimsuit issue comes out?
Well hard to imagine SI doesn't think much of the Big XII, when in the same issue it has an article making a case for Okie State making the playoffs.
The article on lack of NFL Draft picks is just taking pure statistics. It's not based much on just opinion alone. And hard to argue with results in the draft since they don't choose players based on conference allegiance. The evaluate kids on their pure potential in what they bring to their franchise.
I'd wager Dallas or anyone with a decent line will take a chance on Baker, providing he makes it through the year without any severe injury...
The no fun league took two of our backs + Dede just this past draft
Ya I remember reading that part. I had never looked at it that way in regards to the type of blocking the players are taught in the Big XII, versus the type of blocking they require for the NFL. It wasn't so much a knock on the Big XII as it is a knock on the type of offenses that are run and the different fundamentals the players are being taught to excel in it. They just pointed out those fundamentals are the "complete package" development they need these players at on draft day.Picking Okie State doesn't counter what was pointed out in the article, IMO. OU and Texas, they acknowledge are schools that any of the other power 5 schools would like to have, but the offenses that all but KSU run aren't going to attract NFL teams when draft day comes along each year......according to SI. Paraphrasing, the B12 talent hasn't been taught so even really good players from the B12 have to "learn" when they get to the NFL and teams don't want to have to teach players, they want players that already know and have had experience.....this was in regard to offensive lineman. And to your point, it's hard to argue with the facts that SI pointed to regarding the draft numbers, or lack of. Surely these stats are being presented to the recruiting pool....all dreaming of going to the NFL.
Cooper Rush is a good qb based on preseason games.He'll definitely be drafted, but I don't see him making starts anywhere.... ever. Sorry to be negative.
And Dallas could have the backup they want in Cooper Rush, so it's very possible they might be set at QB for some time now.
Ya I remember reading that part. I had never looked at it that way in regards to the type of blocking the players are taught in the Big XII, versus the type of blocking they require for the NFL. It wasn't so much a knock on the Big XII as it is a knock on the type of offenses that are run and the different fundamentals the players are being taught to excel in it. They just pointed out those fundamentals are the "complete package" development they need these players at on draft day.
It would be pretty rough trying to recover and recruit going forward if the Big XII doesn't make it into the playoffs 3 of the first 4 years. Sadly, OU would be included in that talk by association.Another playoff without a B12 team will really hurt the league, so we need the Sooners to avoid losing when they should win this year.
It would be pretty rough trying to recover and recruit going forward if the Big XII doesn't make it into the playoffs 3 of the first 4 years. Sadly, OU would be included in that talk by association.