If he is truly willing to apologize, ask for forgiveness and take this mistake head on like a brave young man, he'll enter the front door with his head held high and do the right thing. His future actions will determine, if he was truly sincere about it.Originally posted by JConXtsy:
They should make him enter through the back door.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
I agree....his actions need to carry on with what he does with the rest of his life..yet I agree, someone on the team should reach out to him as well. Otherwise there is no two way street....and no resolution.Originally posted by WhyNotaSooner:
His actions are speaking louder than his words. I hope one of the team leaders sees this and reaches out to him or vice versa. Let the healing process begin for everyone.
Good post and 10 our of 11 get it.Originally posted by HighStickHarry:
When athletes are allowed to stay at oklahoma (and other universities including mine) for doing far worse acts to society it makes no sense not give this kid a strict path to reinstatement.
Originally posted by JConXtsy:
They should make him enter through the back door.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
At least someone is loose enough to get the joke.Originally posted by Schoonerman:
Originally posted by JConXtsy:
They should make him enter through the back door.
Posted from Rivals Mobile
Well played JCon! Thanks for the laugh!
If it is a strict policy with tough but attainable goals to meet, I could get behind that.Originally posted by HighStickHarry:
When athletes are allowed to stay at oklahoma (and other universities including mine) for doing far worse acts to society it makes no sense not give this kid a strict path to reinstatement.
Well, it didn't take Nostradamus to predict this. Anyone with a pulse could predict that any contrition from this kid would not be well-received. He tried, but I'll stand by my words that it was pointless (only self-serving). I don't think he made anybody feel better about what he did. More than likely, he's just making last ditch efforts to show some remorse in hopes that he can complete his university studies elsewhere. The whole apologize thing just seems really self centered to me. My opinion on that certainly doesn't show any lack of principles on my behalf. What it shows is my cynicism towards these all-too-common, manufactured responses by people that have f'd up royally.Originally posted by JMISASANO:
Your principles appear to be completely out of whack after reading your comments in this thread imho.
You think he is crazy for owning up to his mistake?
Worried about him getting skewered?
What's the point?
Enter the back door?
This post was edited on 3/25 6:36 PM by JMISASANO
I don't know whether the kid is sincere or not, but that actually suggests the opposite to me than it does to you. By now, every reporter and every news organization has made it clear exactly where these songs came from. We know that not only was this song a part of this SAE house at this time, it has been at other SAE chapters. We are aware that this and other songs have been at other fraternities as well, probably at sororities as well. We also know full well that these kids probably grew up thinking this was acceptable and cute.Originally posted by madcow12:
I thought it was a honest apology up till the point where he said this below...the dude was made to do this by his parents and he is a coward fro not saying who and why they taught him the song. If it s a SAE thing at OU, then it is at UT, A&M and every where else and they all need to shut down.
Pettit and another student, Parker Rice, were expelled, and the frat was shut down. Parker has apologized and said the song was "taught to us," sparking questions about whether the song was more widespread.
Pettit would not answer questions about where he and other members of the SAE chapter learned the song.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/levi-pettit-frat-member-sae-racist-chant-video-deeply-sorry-n330226
he isn't just taking the blame, he is taking the fall for upper classmen teaching him the song as well as others. Watching them on that bus tells me all I need to know about that group, they were having a blast with it and if they had not got caught they would still be teaching and smiling and singing that song. U are right, he did come out and we will see how he repairs his future but make no doubt that if he and his group not been caught it would be business as usual at SAE.Originally posted by sybarite:
I don't know whether the kid is sincere or not, but that actually suggests the opposite to me than it does to you. By now, every reporter and every news organization has made it clear exactly where these songs came from. We know that not only was this song a part of this SAE house at this time, it has been at other SAE chapters. We are aware that this and other songs have been at other fraternities as well, probably at sororities as well. We also know full well that these kids probably grew up thinking this was acceptable and cute.Originally posted by madcow12:
I thought it was a honest apology up till the point where he said this below...the dude was made to do this by his parents and he is a coward fro not saying who and why they taught him the song. If it s a SAE thing at OU, then it is at UT, A&M and every where else and they all need to shut down.
Pettit and another student, Parker Rice, were expelled, and the frat was shut down. Parker has apologized and said the song was "taught to us," sparking questions about whether the song was more widespread.
Pettit would not answer questions about where he and other members of the SAE chapter learned the song.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/levi-pettit-frat-member-sae-racist-chant-video-deeply-sorry-n330226
I thought he made it clear that he had never thought of himself as a racist, but that this had caused him to think about it because that song was a racist thing to do. If you had asked every kid on that bus a month ago if he was a racist, he or she would have said no, probably with indignation. Even now, they would say no. They probably think this is an overblown reaction to a bunch of kids who meant no harm.
But, I thought the cowards way out was to blame someone else for teaching him the song. I doubt that SAE found a whole pledge class of freshmen who just happened to know the lyrics to that song. It was obvious who taught them the lyrics. But, that doesn't excuse it. At least he had the "guts," whether sincere or instructed, to take the blame himself. "I'm innocent. I was taught by my SAE chapter," doesn't cut it.
We won't know whether he is sincere until we see his future moves. They will tell the story.
CT, do you really think OU policy should be based on whether some donor should be upset over Boren's actions on this issue?Originally posted by CTOkie:
What if some parents (or other relatives) of the kids at SAE are big donors of OU.....could Boren's actions mean cuts in funding by these parents ? These parents have to be very upset, not only with their kids, but with OU as well.
We may be seeing just the tip of the iceberg on this situation.
It's taking the fall? He's not throwing the blame on a chapter that is dead? He's not outing someone who has already been outed? His apology needed to be about him. We already knew that the SAE and other such organizations were doing this. We didn't need him to tell us.Originally posted by madcow12:
he isn't just taking the blame, he is taking the fall for upper classmen teaching him the song as well as others. Watching them on that bus tells me all I need to know about that group, they were having a blast with it and if they had not got caught they would still be teaching and smiling and singing that song. U are right, he did come out and we will see how he repairs his future but make no doubt that if he and his group not been caught it would be business as usual at SAE.Originally posted by sybarite:
I don't know whether the kid is sincere or not, but that actually suggests the opposite to me than it does to you. By now, every reporter and every news organization has made it clear exactly where these songs came from. We know that not only was this song a part of this SAE house at this time, it has been at other SAE chapters. We are aware that this and other songs have been at other fraternities as well, probably at sororities as well. We also know full well that these kids probably grew up thinking this was acceptable and cute.Originally posted by madcow12:
I thought it was a honest apology up till the point where he said this below...the dude was made to do this by his parents and he is a coward fro not saying who and why they taught him the song. If it s a SAE thing at OU, then it is at UT, A&M and every where else and they all need to shut down.
Pettit and another student, Parker Rice, were expelled, and the frat was shut down. Parker has apologized and said the song was "taught to us," sparking questions about whether the song was more widespread.
Pettit would not answer questions about where he and other members of the SAE chapter learned the song.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/levi-pettit-frat-member-sae-racist-chant-video-deeply-sorry-n330226
I thought he made it clear that he had never thought of himself as a racist, but that this had caused him to think about it because that song was a racist thing to do. If you had asked every kid on that bus a month ago if he was a racist, he or she would have said no, probably with indignation. Even now, they would say no. They probably think this is an overblown reaction to a bunch of kids who meant no harm.
But, I thought the cowards way out was to blame someone else for teaching him the song. I doubt that SAE found a whole pledge class of freshmen who just happened to know the lyrics to that song. It was obvious who taught them the lyrics. But, that doesn't excuse it. At least he had the "guts," whether sincere or instructed, to take the blame himself. "I'm innocent. I was taught by my SAE chapter," doesn't cut it.
We won't know whether he is sincere until we see his future moves. They will tell the story.
Allowing those offended to vent, question your sincerity and expect greater future actions than just words are all part of the healing process. Who didn't expect that?Originally posted by JConXtsy:
Well, it didn't take Nostradamus to predict this. Anyone with a pulse could predict that any contrition from this kid would not be well-received. He tried, but I'll stand by my words that it was pointless (only self-serving). I don't think he made anybody feel better about what he did. More than likely, he's just making last ditch efforts to show some remorse in hopes that he can complete his university studies elsewhere. The whole apologize thing just seems really self centered to me. My opinion on that certainly doesn't show any lack of principles on my behalf. What it shows is my cynicism towards these all-too-common, manufactured responses by people that have f'd up royally.Originally posted by JMISASANO:
Your principles appear to be completely out of whack after reading your comments in this thread imho.
You think he is crazy for owning up to his mistake?
Worried about him getting skewered?
What's the point?
Enter the back door?
This post was edited on 3/25 6:36 PM by JMISASANO
In the end, he didn't really admit to what he did as being driven by racial prejudice. He took the political way out by claiming that he was caught up in the activities and "didn't know what (he) was doing." Pppppfffffffffffffffffft. Stupid.
SKEWERED - just take a look at Twitter or the comments sections of any news piece written about the event yesterday. Op-ed columns and the sincerity (or lack thereof) will be following surely.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/former-sae-fraternity-member-apologizes-racist-chant
Pettit's apology was less well-received on Twitter, where many expressed incredulity toward his mea culpea. "You don't get to use Black people as a force field and expect me to believe that you're sorry," wrote #SAE chant was. Sure. I can see how "you can hang them from a tree" can be ambiguous.
True big donors understand just how delicate this issue is to the university as any lack of immediate action by Boren would have turned OU's campus into a protest alley with hundreds, if not thousands, of protesters bused from around the country.Originally posted by CTOkie:
What if some parents (or other relatives) of the kids at SAE are big donors of OU.....could Boren's actions mean cuts in funding by these parents ? These parents have to be very upset, not only with their kids, but with OU as well.
We may be seeing just the tip of the iceberg on this situation.
No, not at all, but money speaks louder than words.....and principles....in many cases.Originally posted by roygbell:
CT, do you really think OU policy should be based on whether some donor should be upset over Boren's actions on this issue?Originally posted by CTOkie:
What if some parents (or other relatives) of the kids at SAE are big donors of OU.....could Boren's actions mean cuts in funding by these parents ? These parents have to be very upset, not only with their kids, but with OU as well.
We may be seeing just the tip of the iceberg on this situation.
I would say to hell with them if that would be their attitude. I don't think OU needs these types, period. I don't think you meant your words as being "political". However, doing what you suggested wouild be taking the political way out and that is the problem as to many in the past have just used politics as an excuse.
So I'll take it that you think having a family that is beyond rich and able to afford one of the most expensive "crisis and issues management" consultants in the state to coach you up and write a speech for you is being a MAN?Originally posted by JMISASANO:
So, simply take it like a MAN, own up, lead by example and hopefully learn from your mistake!
Perhaps you believe in running, hiding and letting it all blow over?
I disagree. He was there for his own contrition. If he answers that question, it doesn't difuse. It pours gasoline. Ratting out even lousy other human beings doesn't solve the problem. If he was truly contrite, and I take him at his word that he was, and forgiveness was offered in light of that, then that was what was called for here. Talking about others only passes his guilt elsewhere. There might be a future time for him to testify against others. This wasn't the day for that.Originally posted by madcow12:
I thought it was a honest apology up till the point where he said this below...the dude was made to do this by his parents and he is a coward fro not saying who and why they taught him the song. If it s a SAE thing at OU, then it is at UT, A&M and every where else and they all need to shut down.
Pettit and another student, Parker Rice, were expelled, and the frat was shut down. Parker has apologized and said the song was "taught to us," sparking questions about whether the song was more widespread.
Pettit would not answer questions about where he and other members of the SAE chapter learned the song.
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/levi-pettit-frat-member-sae-racist-chant-video-deeply-sorry-n330226
He answered questions that were relevant to his error.Originally posted by JConXtsy:
So I'll take it that you think having a family that is beyond rich and able to afford one of the most expensive "crisis and issues management" consultants in the state to coach you up and write a speech for you is being a MAN?Originally posted by JMISASANO:
So, simply take it like a MAN, own up, lead by example and hopefully learn from your mistake!
Perhaps you believe in running, hiding and letting it all blow over?
I never once commented on what he should do. I only stated what he shouldn't do, give a meaningless, manufactured, televised speech as a publicity stunt.
What was the purpose to give a speech if he wasn't going to talk from the heart or answer questions? I know how to read. He could have just given his speech to the media to print like Coletti (oops, I mean his parents) did.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/billcoletti
Oh, and those op-eds skewering his sincerity are making it to the press now. The internet is now littered with them.
That's the last I need to say on the matter.
There isn't a single donor that can out spend Federal dollars.Originally posted by CTOkie:
No, not at all, but money speaks louder than words.....and principles....in many cases.Originally posted by roygbell:
CT, do you really think OU policy should be based on whether some donor should be upset over Boren's actions on this issue?Originally posted by CTOkie:
What if some parents (or other relatives) of the kids at SAE are big donors of OU.....could Boren's actions mean cuts in funding by these parents ? These parents have to be very upset, not only with their kids, but with OU as well.
We may be seeing just the tip of the iceberg on this situation.
I would say to hell with them if that would be their attitude. I don't think OU needs these types, period. I don't think you meant your words as being "political". However, doing what you suggested wouild be taking the political way out and that is the problem as to many in the past have just used politics as an excuse.
Oh, sure and by all means just give lip service and play the political games with this issue, right?Originally posted by CTOkie:
No, not at all, but money speaks louder than words.....and principles....in many cases.Originally posted by roygbell:
CT, do you really think OU policy should be based on whether some donor should be upset over Boren's actions on this issue?Originally posted by CTOkie:
What if some parents (or other relatives) of the kids at SAE are big donors of OU.....could Boren's actions mean cuts in funding by these parents ? These parents have to be very upset, not only with their kids, but with OU as well.
We may be seeing just the tip of the iceberg on this situation.
I would say to hell with them if that would be their attitude. I don't think OU needs these types, period. I don't think you meant your words as being "political". However, doing what you suggested wouild be taking the political way out and that is the problem as to many in the past have just used politics as an excuse.
Roy, I'm not suggesting a thing. I have said from day one that Boren had no choice in making his decision. I was only throwing out a scenario that might be looming based on things I have heard. OU will survive from this event one way or the other.Originally posted by roygbell:
Oh, sure and by all means just give lip service and play the political games with this issue, right?Originally posted by CTOkie:
No, not at all, but money speaks louder than words.....and principles....in many cases.Originally posted by roygbell:
CT, do you really think OU policy should be based on whether some donor should be upset over Boren's actions on this issue?Originally posted by CTOkie:
What if some parents (or other relatives) of the kids at SAE are big donors of OU.....could Boren's actions mean cuts in funding by these parents ? These parents have to be very upset, not only with their kids, but with OU as well.
We may be seeing just the tip of the iceberg on this situation.
I would say to hell with them if that would be their attitude. I don't think OU needs these types, period. I don't think you meant your words as being "political". However, doing what you suggested wouild be taking the political way out and that is the problem as to many in the past have just used politics as an excuse.
That is exactly what you are suggesting. And, that is the reason we are still in this situation. And, it is the same thing that got Penn State in the mess they were in with the Paterno situation. They were more interested in donors and playing politics than taking care of a cancer of a pedophile on their campus. They crawled into a hole and covered the situation up with crap ... and what did that get them.
I am proud of David Boren for tackling this issue and taking no nonsense, no tolerance on what happened at OU. Who wants a donor who wants to sweep this crap under the rug.
You mean no donor can out spend the Feds ability to borrow money and run up the national debt?? lolOriginally posted by JMISASANO:
There isn't a single donor that can out spend Federal dollars.
Enough said.
OK, maybe I was reading between the lines ... as it sounded like you were suggesting that we shouldn't ruffle a donor's feathersOriginally posted by CTOkie:
Roy, I'm not suggesting a thing. I have said from day one that Boren had no choice in making his decision. I was only throwing out a scenario that might be looming based on things I have heard. OU will survive from this event one way or the other.Originally posted by roygbell:
Oh, sure and by all means just give lip service and play the political games with this issue, right?Originally posted by CTOkie:
No, not at all, but money speaks louder than words.....and principles....in many cases.Originally posted by roygbell:
CT, do you really think OU policy should be based on whether some donor should be upset over Boren's actions on this issue?Originally posted by CTOkie:
What if some parents (or other relatives) of the kids at SAE are big donors of OU.....could Boren's actions mean cuts in funding by these parents ? These parents have to be very upset, not only with their kids, but with OU as well.
We may be seeing just the tip of the iceberg on this situation.
I would say to hell with them if that would be their attitude. I don't think OU needs these types, period. I don't think you meant your words as being "political". However, doing what you suggested wouild be taking the political way out and that is the problem as to many in the past have just used politics as an excuse.
That is exactly what you are suggesting. And, that is the reason we are still in this situation. And, it is the same thing that got Penn State in the mess they were in with the Paterno situation. They were more interested in donors and playing politics than taking care of a cancer of a pedophile on their campus. They crawled into a hole and covered the situation up with crap ... and what did that get them.
I am proud of David Boren for tackling this issue and taking no nonsense, no tolerance on what happened at OU. Who wants a donor who wants to sweep this crap under the rug.