I don't understand how we have never lost to a better team. Every time we lose it's to an inferior team and because of coaching. How can that be possible?When we were up 10-6, I made the comment in the game thread that it felt like the Clemson game. We started out fast but then it seemed bonehead play calling hit us again and the momentum was flittering away.
At least in the playoff game, we had the halftime lead before getting skunked in the second half.
Bob can coach here for another 100 years and we will not sniff #8. We will be a better program once the Stoops brothers are gone. Briles was every bit the moral joke at Baylor. But, in his pre-game and in-game planning, he had the killer instinct that Bob sorely lacks.
Wish we didn't have our top 2 coaches merely trying to hold onto past glories. They've become fat-catters.
I thoroughly believe that UH was not the better team today. But, they were the better prepared team by a mile.
When we were up 10-6, I made the comment in the game thread that it felt like the Clemson game. We started out fast but then it seemed bonehead play calling hit us again and the momentum was flittering away.
Bob can coach here for another 100 years and we will not sniff #8. We will be a better program once the Stoops brothers are gone. Briles was every bit the moral joke at Baylor. But, in his pre-game and in-game planning, he had the killer instinct that Bob sorely lacks.
Wish we didn't have our top 2 coaches merely trying to hold onto past glories. They've become fat-catters.
I thoroughly believe that UH was not the better team today. But, they were the better prepared team by a mile.
Hey Billy.Yes you did make that comment in the game thread early, and you were right on the money fortworth!!!
I can't agree with you 100% on the part I bolded though. While I do agree that Bob will never get another national title at OU, I also don't assume OU will be better once the Stoops brothers are gone. It's a dice roll. Does OU want to be content with winning 10 games a year, winning conference titles, but really have almost no chance at winning a national title?? Or does OU want to take a chance, hire an up and coming motivated coach that can propel the program back to national titles, but there is that chance OU could also sink down into the 90s funk if they make bad hires??
Some are so afraid and scared of the 90s, that they are willing to accept sustained success at a certain level to prevent a sink to the 90s, even if it means they are trading away the chance at attaining national titles again. It's the typical risk-vs-reward scenario.
While I agree OU was the more TALENTED team, I think it's hard to argue that Houston was the better TEAM today. Houston was no doubt the better prepared and better motivated team today. It's almost as if Bob and OU came into this game thinking they could just walk away with a win without really exposing much of their offensive playbook like they could get away with against the UTEPs or San Diego States of the college football world.
I believe, for the most part, the field talent is there. It's perhaps the sideline talent that does not match the former.Maybe we need to do a better job recruiting. Seems like we are slipping on talent.
When we were up 10-6, I made the comment in the game thread that it felt like the Clemson game. We started out fast but then it seemed bonehead play calling hit us again and the momentum was flittering away.
At least in the playoff game, we had the halftime lead before getting skunked in the second half.
Bob can coach here for another 100 years and we will not sniff #8. We will be a better program once the Stoops brothers are gone. Briles was every bit the moral joke at Baylor. But, in his pre-game and in-game planning, he had the killer instinct that Bob sorely lacks.
Wish we didn't have our top 2 coaches merely trying to hold onto past glories. They've become fat-catters.
I thoroughly believe that UH was not the better team today. But, they were the better prepared team by a mile.
You think UT was better than OU last year and in other recent years? How 'bout those Baylor losses under Briles? And, there are many others during Bob's tenure. We have lost to teams that were better prepared, not with better field talent though, imho.I don't understand how we have never lost to a better team. Every time we lose it's to an inferior team and because of coaching. How can that be possible?
I agree, they were better...TODAY. They appeared to be playing for something.I agree & disgree. UH was indeed better prepared but there was no doubt that the Cougars were indeed the better team today in every phase of the game. Every phase. We got our butts handed to us and while it isn't any fun, I give props to the Cougars. They out coached us, out played us, and they physically kicked some Sooner ass today.
I watched the Baylor game last night and their passing attack was mostly the quick pop slants 3-5 yards downfield that turned into first downs opening up their running game, decreasing the burden on their OL to pass protect, and creating chaos and stress on their defenders. I was wondering in our game why we weren't similarly taking advantage of what their defense was willing to give us.
I agree, they were better...TODAY. They appeared to be playing for something.
No...not really.Bet some of yall mouth breathers are missing Sanchez now.
Alabama is and has been the template for which all teams should incorporate....but that template is made by winning big games and winning within the nation's strongest conference for years and years....and for most teams such a scenario simply cannot happen.CT, when you talk about how much of a gap there is between OU and a program like Alabama. I think the outcomes of both of their games yesterday paints the picture. Alabama really lost more talent off last years team than OU did off theirs. But judging by both teams performances yesterday, which team is OBVIOUSLY better at reloading year to year??? Alabama by a mile!!! Alabama just destroyed USC. Alabama just reloaded at the positions that lost starters from last year, and they just keep on rolling. While when OU loses some players, it seems it takes an entire season worth of experience for the OU players to finally get up to the level OU needs them to play at. That is coaching. Period.
And yes, I do concur that last season was a bit of a mirage. The KEY tests last year were going to be Baylor, TCU, and OSU. Those games never turned into the tests everyone expected, because all those teams had lost their starting QBs. So I do think that gave many a warm and fuzzy feeling about the defense that really was being based on wins against depleted opponents.
My worst concerns were actualized:
OU had to play against a great dual threat quarterback and once again, had no answers for containing him.
Quality and depth of the wide receiver corps lacking.
Well I think Alabama has simply set the standard for developing players and having them as ready as any program in the country for their first live-game college snaps. But this is Saban's 10th season at Alabama, and there just has hardly been ANY drop off in that timespan in regards to rebuilding, reloading, or replacing players that depart/graduate every season. It's just a combination of superior evaluation, superior development, and superior game planning that Saban demands of his staff and players. Sure Alabama has the advantage of being right in the middle of prolly the most talent rich recruiting grounds in the country. But plenty of programs are also located in that region. And Alabama wasn't the monolith they are now prior to Saban's arrival. It's just flat out superior coaching. I have no clue what Saban's secrets are to achieve this, but I'm quite certain Bob hasn't figured out that secret either.Alabama is and has been the template for which all teams should incorporate....but that template is made by winning big games and winning within the nation's strongest conference for years and years....and for most teams such a scenario simply cannot happen.
At 67 years, I feel that I may have seen my last championship at OU. I feel there will be more winning seasons and some great games, but I believe OU's success has a ceiling that can't be exceeded. The three best teams since the last championship were the 2003, 2004 and 2008 teams. Each of those teams lost to better teams (LSU, USC and Florida) in the postseason.....and since the 2008 season, OU really has not put forth a monster team.
The one thing I have noticed is the TOTAL lack of fire!! I'm an old school swagger guy....You KNEW when Barry's teams came on the field, they were there to compete and smash you in the mouth!! Bob's teams have been VERY soft for years....They can talk and do their dances, but they don't seem to back it up on the field. Yesterday, how many times were Houston RE's wide open and beyond OUr coverage? They plain stunk up the place!! Where's the pass rush? Sure they contained Ward from running, but they either need to get to the QB or they need to have the greatest coverage in CF. We have neither! Don't want to talk Offense....another meltdown with no adjustments..PERIOD!Well I think Alabama has simply set the standard for developing players and having them as ready as any program in the country for their first live-game college snaps. But this is Saban's 10th season at Alabama, and there just has hardly been ANY drop off in that timespan in regards to rebuilding, reloading, or replacing players that depart/graduate every season. It's just a combination of superior evaluation, superior development, and superior game planning that Saban demands of his staff and players. Sure Alabama has the advantage of being right in the middle of prolly the most talent rich recruiting grounds in the country. But plenty of programs are also located in that region. And Alabama wasn't the monolith they are now prior to Saban's arrival. It's just flat out superior coaching. I have no clue what Saban's secrets are to achieve this, but I'm quite certain Bob hasn't figured out that secret either.
And I'm starting to share your thoughts that OU has topped out with Bob Stoops. I'm not going to throw the towel in on this season after just one game, but I think overall if you look at the recent years of OU football, a trend has developed. OU with Bob will always be a program that can average about 10 wins a season, and generally compete for conference titles, and make a playoff spot from time to time when the stars and planets align during the season. But anything beyond that I think is VERY unlikely to happen.
In coaching, it's called having that "killer instinct".Well I think Alabama has simply set the standard for developing players and having them as ready as any program in the country for their first live-game college snaps. But this is Saban's 10th season at Alabama, and there just has hardly been ANY drop off in that timespan in regards to rebuilding, reloading, or replacing players that depart/graduate every season. It's just a combination of superior evaluation, superior development, and superior game planning that Saban demands of his staff and players. Sure Alabama has the advantage of being right in the middle of prolly the most talent rich recruiting grounds in the country. But plenty of programs are also located in that region. And Alabama wasn't the monolith they are now prior to Saban's arrival. It's just flat out superior coaching. I have no clue what Saban's secrets are to achieve this, but I'm quite certain Bob hasn't figured out that secret either.
And I'm starting to share your thoughts that OU has topped out with Bob Stoops. I'm not going to throw the towel in on this season after just one game, but I think overall if you look at the recent years of OU football, a trend has developed. OU with Bob will always be a program that can average about 10 wins a season, and generally compete for conference titles, and make a playoff spot from time to time when the stars and planets align during the season. But anything beyond that I think is VERY unlikely to happen.
More and more, I find myself in disagreement with Plaino. I gave up on Bob winning another national title several years ago. We don't play like a title team. We are a constant flow of mistakes, and a complete lack of dominance, unless we are playing a bad team. We lost each of the BCS games we have been in--lost because we didn't have the character.You guys ragging on BStoops need to be very careful this week. Do not take an enema of any kind. Otherwise, you'll turn invisible. And no colonoscopies for at least a month.
Your opinion, as always, is appreciated.You guys ragging on BStoops need to be very careful this week. Do not take an enema of any kind. Otherwise, you'll turn invisible. And no colonoscopies for at least a month.
Ward had a net rushing output of a single yard but because he IS a dual action QB, that means he can also pass even when his running is contained. Him being a run-pass QB had everything to do with the game 's outcome. Houston would not have won the game without his passing, which was aided by the threat of his running.Good gawd - can we stick to the facts please? G. Ward Jr.: 18 rushes for 1 yard.
His "dual" had nothing to do with beating us; that was one area our D actually did good. Our secondary and lack of pass rush did us in, but with Sanchez, Tapper, Striker and Bond all gone, this is somewhat expected against a QB who tore FSU up.
The real problem, as touched on above, is Baker rushing 13 times for minus 1 yard...and how many other times did he dance out of the pocket but ended up throwing it away?
All off season the brightest new light on the O was supposedly Miller - with both Baker and Bob on record talking him up (Bob specifically said Dede, Miller and then "the others") - and we toss to him freaking once!?!?!? Overall Baker targeted our officially listed #2 WRs ONCE (Mead and Miller), against a pass D that was ranked in the 100s last year. Its not that our #2s dropped balls or passes were inaccurate towards them; they just were never thrown to/"targeted" (except the one time to Miller for a diving 9 yard grab), because Mayfield was trying to create all kinds of time by bailing on the pocket instead of establishing a rhythm by hitting slants and outs. Yes the OL is a prob, but if plays are called that get the ball out of your QB's hands then that helps mitigate your OL's issues.
Biggest problem facing us: RILEY NEEDS TO REIN IN MAYFIELD AND MAKE HIM DEVELOP A RHYTHM.
Ward had a net rushing output of a single yard but because he IS a dual action QB, that means he can also pass even when his running is contained. Him being a run-pass QB had everything to do with the game 's outcome. Houston would not have won the game without his passing, which was aided by the threat of his running.