Against Syracuse....seems to be kind of a F you to Mountaineers for a second or third rounder.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Against Syracuse....seems to be kind of a F you to Mountaineers for a second or third rounder.
Very bad trend. These guys would not even get the opportunity to play at the next level if not for being given the opportunity to play College Football on a scholarship at their respective Schools. Finish out your commitment to your School and your team and play unless you are hurt of course.
Spoiled pampered wusses in my opinion.
As far as being meaningless bowls because of the playoffs I disagree.
A Bowl Game is a tremendous opportunity for a Program and I would bet most players are thrilled to go Bowling vs sitting at home.
If I were the Coach guys that want to sit would be off the team immediately and would definately not travel with the team but I am old school, you start something you finish it.
Utter disrespect for their fans, teammates and program. It’s all about ME. We had a defensive lineman that essentially did the same thing mid-season a few years ago.
For him to be given a second chance by the Mountaineers, then he pulls this crap, is inexcusable. I would be pretty disappointed if I had bought a bowl ticket. One of their OL also has elected to sit out. If you are injured or fighting a real injury that is one thing, but selfish action if you are fit and able. The NCAA needs to do something about that.
Against Syracuse....seems to be kind of a F you to Mountaineers for a second or third rounder.
So the bowl wins over Syracuse, Tennessee, Florida State (1979-1980), Penn State, Auburn, Nebraska, Houston, Virginia, Oregon, Stanford were just “money making exhibition games” ?
"Meaningless bowls".
A new phrase used by millennials ?
Nope... because there was no playoff. The only way to combat this situation is to expand the playoff to keep the top players around longer.
Yes, yes they were. If you really think about it, all college and professional football games are money making entertainment.So the bowl wins over Syracuse, Tennessee, Florida State (1979-1980), Penn State, Auburn, Nebraska, Houston, Virginia, Oregon, Stanford were just “money making exhibition games” ?
I believe this is more fake news. I think both of the kids will play for WVU.
----------------------
.
How did pro football get into this ?Yes, yes they were. If you really think about it, all college and professional football games are money making entertainment.
BIG difference between the 60's, 70's, 80's and 90's and now: back then a 3rd or 4th rounder would need to become a star and earn a big enough payday to last a lifetime only after proving themselves through the end of their rookie contract.
Now, even 2nd, 3rd and 4th rounders are making BIG bucks in their rookie contract. But, the higher the pick, the most guaranteed money. Draftees looking to go 1st, 2nd, 3rd rounds are risking big time by playing. If your team hasn't made the playoff, there's very little upside to playing in a bowl, and huge downside risk.
Times have changed. This very much seems like a "Get off my lawn!!" issue for some