Afrer seeing how bad we were against a mobile quarterback today and how good Ward was today against Florida St, I am much more worried about the opener at Houston next season.
Didn't Houston lose to UConn? I think the Cougars were a very solid team. But I wouldn't worry about the start of the season. If you do, it's wasted energy.
Might catch us looking ahead to Ohio State.Didn't Houston lose to UConn? I think the Cougars were a very solid team. But I wouldn't worry about the start of the season. If you do, it's wasted energy.
Houston lost to UConn without Ward at quarterback and while UConn had a poor offense, its defense was pretty good.....plus the game was played at UConn.Didn't Houston lose to UConn? I think the Cougars were a very solid team. But I wouldn't worry about the start of the season. If you do, it's wasted energy.
Houston's rise could eventually earn it entry into the Big 12 and once in, I see no reason why the UH could not become a formidable team. Just a few years ago many here were throwing TCU and Baylor under the bus.....and once upon a time the UH was a national power under Coach Yeoman. Houston could play its home games with OU, Texas, TCU and Baylor at Reliant Stadium and the Big 12 would benefit from having the market of the country's 4th largest city.Houston is on the rise. I think they'll start off with a decent ranking. The game is in their backyard. It's too early for a prediction of course, but you bet that they will have this game circled. To start their season beating OU would be huge for their program. They know this.
CT, I'm not sure what the stadium holds, but UoH just completed a new starum. It maybe smaller than most stadiums, but it's equipped withe latest technology and comfort. I'll google it up.Houston's rise could eventually earn it entry into the Big 12 and once in, I see no reason why the UH could not become a formidable team. Just a few years ago many here were throwing TCU and Baylor under the bus.....and once upon a time the UH was a national power under Coach Yeoman. Houston could play its home games with OU, Texas, TCU and Baylor at Reliant Stadium and the Big 12 would benefit from having the market of the country's 4th largest city.
As for next year, the OU-UH game could be a big game and could determine the season's successes for both teams.
Exactly CT. Not sure why anyone would look at Houston and consider it "wasted energy" to be worried about facing them early in the season next year. Houston could very well be a legit threat that OU needs to take seriously and not consider it "wasted energy" and just chalk it up as a win just because it's Houston. Herman is a damn good coach and has done an incredible job at Houston. Some respect may be in order.Houston lost to UConn without Ward at quarterback and while UConn had a poor offense, its defense was pretty good.....plus the game was played at UConn.
Houston looks like a team to be ascending and is having good recruiting classes. Ward will return in 2016 as well and if healthy, he will give OU all it can handle.
Ohio State is the game to worry about, they are the power running tam with the great OL/DL. They can do just what Clemson did to OU, save worse with a 225 lb QB.
Exactly CT. Not sure why anyone would look at Houston and consider it "wasted energy" to be worried about facing them early in the season next year. Houston could very well be a legit threat that OU needs to take seriously and not consider it "wasted energy" and just chalk it up as a win just because it's Houston. Herman is a damn good coach and has done an incredible job at Houston. Some respect may be in order.
I like it too because very early in the 2016 season, we will know what direction OU football is going with two games against Houston and Ohio State.Playing Houston and Ohio State in non-conference is a very good schedule for OU. Maybe the best in the country. I like it.
I like it too because very early in the 2016 season, we will know what direction OU football is going with two games against Houston and Ohio State.
I expect another good year for Stoops' team in 2016....9-10 wins and a bowl berth. However, if OU somehow wins these two games to start the season and enters the Texas game unbeaten, I will really get excited.
But as you pointed out recently, OU and the Big 12 need to change their "culture" of spread offenses and shabby defenses. This post season has been a serious indictment of the weakness of the conference and its adherence to finesse, arena football style way of playing the game. It's fun to watch when the conference teams play themselves, but it doesn't translate into winning national championships.
You also mentioned that Bob Stoops, while accomplishing a HOF resume at OU, would likely be even more successful coaching in the SEC. Hopefully, I haven't misunderstood your statement....but it does give me something to think about that I had not considered before. Imagine what he could do at Florida for example.
I do not see how OU could have a better coach than Stoops, all things considered. The only way that ANY team should change coaches is if that change is an upgrade. I do not see an upgrade for Stoops anywhere, nor do I advocate replacing him.CT, my reference to Bob possibly being more successful in the Big 10 or SEC was my way of touting an OU membership to one of those conferences. I can see how you came to your conclusion, however. That's my fault. I certainly don't advocate Bob leaving OU. I want the Sooners to compete for national championships and I feel that would be more of a possibility if we could attract big 4-5 star OL, DL and LBs that strengthens our opportunities to compete with more physical teams we are likely to meet in the playoffs. I may be way off, and probably will get critiqued pretty badly, but I see the Big 12 like the old 1960's AFC league. Teams that win a lot of games but falter when they go up against teams with a defense that can shut down the running game and run through the light weight backers and DBs. When you play in the Big 12, your LBs have to cover, so speed is necessary. That's great until they meet up big physical teams. Bob puts together a squad that must compete in the conference he plays in. If OU were to leave the B12, I am very confident he could field a national winning team where the strengthen in its defense and a capable balance offensive attack.
Heck ya it's a good thing. I love that OU schedules some legit non-conference games.Playing Houston and Ohio State in non-conference is a very good schedule for OU. Maybe the best in the country. I like it.
I like it too because very early in the 2016 season, we will know what direction OU football is going with two games against Houston and Ohio State.
I expect another good year for Stoops' team in 2016....9-10 wins and a bowl berth. However, if OU somehow wins these two games to start the season and enters the Texas game unbeaten, I will really get excited.
But as you pointed out recently, OU and the Big 12 need to change their "culture" of spread offenses and shabby defenses. This post season has been a serious indictment of the weakness of the conference and its adherence to finesse, arena football style way of playing the game. It's fun to watch when the conference teams play themselves, but it doesn't translate into winning national championships.
You also mentioned that Bob Stoops, while accomplishing a HOF resume at OU, would likely be even more successful coaching in the SEC. Hopefully, I haven't misunderstood your statement....but it does give me something to think about that I had not considered before. Imagine what he could do at Florida for example.
CT, my reference to Bob possibly being more successful in the Big 10 or SEC was my way of touting an OU membership to one of those conferences. I can see how you came to your conclusion, however. That's my fault. I certainly don't advocate Bob leaving OU. I want the Sooners to compete for national championships and I feel that would be more of a possibility if we could attract big 4-5 star OL, DL and LBs that strengthens our opportunities to compete with more physical teams we are likely to meet in the playoffs. I may be way off, and probably will get critiqued pretty badly, but I see the Big 12 like the old 1960's AFC league. Teams that win a lot of games but falter when they go up against teams with a defense that can shut down the running game and run through the light weight backers and DBs. When you play in the Big 12, your LBs have to cover, so speed is necessary. That's great until they meet up big physical teams. Bob puts together a squad that must compete in the conference he plays in. If OU were to leave the B12, I am very confident he could field a national winning team where the strengthen in its defense and a capable balance offensive attack.