I've never been a big fan of using recruiting rankings and how many stars a player has to forecast whether OUs recruiting classes are legit or not. No doubt there are countless examples of 2star or 3star kids becoming incredible players. But last night it was pretty obvious OU was beaten with superior talent. So in a debate about recruiting on the pay board a guy posted this article. It was a really interesting read. And makes me take a step back and maybe force myself to reevaluate my views on recruiting rankings and just how important recruiting 4 and 5 star players are.
http://www.foxsports.com/college-fo...sses-are-necessary-for-national-titles-020515
http://www.foxsports.com/college-fo...sses-are-necessary-for-national-titles-020515