With the ACC on the edge of breaking apart, I have been paying attention to the whole realignment question. There is something that I don't understand. All the Conference Commissioners have said any team they added would have to be additive, meaning they would have to increase the value of the League's deal per time. No team is willing to take a revenue cut in order to add a team. I keep hearing talk of UNC being a key figure to be added to the SEC. I know UNC is huge in MBB, but everything I have seen says FB is what drives the revenue and it's not even close. If all of this is true, how do you justify adding UNC FB? they aren't that big of a brand in FB. Am I missing a piece of the puzzle?
Conference realignment question.
- Thread starter BomberSooner
- Start date
