today's version was the worst.. Looked dirty, black shoes , ugh! Our traditional uniform is one of the best in football, what's the deal?
today's version was the worst.. Looked dirty, black shoes , ugh! Our traditional uniform is one of the best in football, what's the deal?
today's version was the worst.. Looked dirty, black shoes , ugh! Our traditional uniform is one of the best in football, what's the deal?
Wow you really bring a lot of history to this board I am 42, so I appreciate posters that have some history. My kid likes New unis that are different but not too extreme. I am old school.Bill, I don't know how old you are, but I'm 64 and I like em just about as much as you do.
But the players seem to like them a lot. If you've seen the video of when they were unveiled before I guess it was last season, the players went nuts.
There seems to be an inverse relationship between how old you are and how much you like the alternate uni's.
The players like them for whatever long ago reasons.
The coaches like them, because for whatever reason, the players and especially the recruits seem to prefer the new look a month philosophy and by changing the combinations, we can do that.
And Nike really loves them, because they have more kinds of OU jerseys that they can sell.
I remember when I was 15 in 1966 and Jim Mackenzie changed OU's uniform look drastically. We went from white helmets with a crimson stripe white and and absolutely nothing to decorate the jersey or the pants, to a very different look.
Solid crimson helmets with no stripe, but northwestern stripes on the jerseys and piping on the pants. The interlocking OU on the side of the helmet was this small little sticker less than four inches high. And for the first time, TV numbers on the sleeves.
When Chuck Fairbanks took over in 67 the helmet logo more than doubled in size to the same look as is now the tradition. And in every one of these looks, solid black shoes.
Fairbanks changed the look in 1969. We took away the stripes on the shirts. New Mesh material for the first time. Still black shoes.
When Joe Namath went to the NFL, he was the only player in the league to wear white shoes.
For the 1970 Astro Bluebonnet Bowl, we put names on the back of the jersey. A year later, we wore white shoes, I think the first college team to do that. But the trim was black on the shoes. A year later, Spotbilt made crimson trim for the first time. The players loved it.
Sometime in Barry's time, they putting the team name on the front.
Every one of these changes, the players loved it.
1957 Orange Bowl
1963 OB. We lost because of two Grisham red zone fumbles.
But two great Bama players. The game highlights don't start until halfway through the video.
The only change and change back during Bud's time, was when the NCAA started requiring numbers on the sides of the helmets in the early 60s. Otherwise, his team's uni's had no embellishments at all.
Alternate uniforms are ridiculous. You don't see Bama wearing this crap. We have one of the most recognizable unis and traditions in college athletics and we try to get cutetoday's version was the worst.. Looked dirty, black shoes , ugh! Our traditional uniform is one of the best in football, what's the deal?
Bill, I don't know how old you are, but I'm 64 and I like em just about as much as you do.
But the players seem to like them a lot. If you've seen the video of when they were unveiled before I guess it was last season, the players went nuts.
There seems to be an inverse relationship between how old you are and how much you like the alternate uni's.
The players like them for whatever long ago reasons.
The coaches like them, because for whatever reason, the players and especially the recruits seem to prefer the new look a month philosophy and by changing the combinations, we can do that.
And Nike really loves them, because they have more kinds of OU jerseys that they can sell.
I remember when I was 15 in 1966 and Jim Mackenzie changed OU's uniform look drastically. We went from white helmets with a crimson stripe white and and absolutely nothing to decorate the jersey or the pants, to a very different look.
Solid crimson helmets with no stripe, but northwestern stripes on the jerseys and piping on the pants. The interlocking OU on the side of the helmet was this small little sticker less than four inches high. And for the first time, TV numbers on the sleeves.
When Chuck Fairbanks took over in 67 the helmet logo more than doubled in size to the same look as is now the tradition. And in every one of these looks, solid black shoes.
Fairbanks changed the look in 1969. We took away the stripes on the shirts. New Mesh material for the first time. Still black shoes.
When Joe Namath went to the NFL, he was the only player in the league to wear white shoes.
For the 1970 Astro Bluebonnet Bowl, we put names on the back of the jersey. A year later, we wore white shoes, I think the first college team to do that. But the trim was black on the shoes. A year later, Spotbilt made crimson trim for the first time. The players loved it.
Sometime in Barry's time, they putting the team name on the front.
Every one of these changes, the players loved it.
1957 Orange Bowl
1963 OB. We lost because of two Grisham red zone fumbles.
But two great Bama players. The game highlights don't start until halfway through the video.
The only change and change back during Bud's time, was when the NCAA started requiring numbers on the sides of the helmets in the early 60s. Otherwise, his team's uni's had no embellishments at all.
What teams didn't wear black cleats in those days? Was there another color available? I know in the mid 70's I only had two choices. Black or white. I could buy some red Chuck Taylor's for basketball, but in football or baseball you had black or white, period. My older brothers loved the fact that they could wear white baseball spikes. They grew up a few years after you and had no option until high school.
Joe Washington had to paint his shoes silver. I had to paint mine as well, but old T.K. wouldn't let me wear them and certainly wouldn't give me number 24. I guess I didn't deserve it though. I was no Joe Washington by any stretch of the imagination. I suppose Steve Ulmer didn't deserve that scar down the side of his face from a white baseball spike, but it wouldn't have bothered me if it would have been his brother....
If a kid wants to really play and get a shot at the NFL, it won't matter what he wears. I like tradition and being old school. Alabama has an alternate uni, I think they are black, but have not worn them yet.
the team should get to vote on what uniforms they want.
Cream jersey and Crimson britches. I've seen the Texans wear the white top and red skirts* and that looks good.I was at the game.
I thought the uniforms looked bad. I like the red bottoms with the white tops ... but this was pretty bad.
And the Kansas fans even commented on the uniforms. One said they looked like high school stuff.
I would imagine some of the original designs by the team members were vetoed out by the administration/alumni. This was a compromise. I think it is just weird that the kids get excited about putting on a wild uniform versus playing ball....or that an exciting uniform improves their performance?...'eh?I don't object to the concept of alternate unis, but if we're going to do it, then it needs to absolutely POP! This wood grain thing just doesn't do that. I doubt it catches any recruits' attention.
What uniforms were worn at the RRR last month?
Seriously, I can't remember, but I do remember the loss.